ArticleACS omega2023
In Silico-Based Structural Evaluation to Categorize the Pathogenicity of Mutations Identified in the RAD Class of Proteins.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RAD genes, known as double-strand break repair proteins, play a major role in maintaining the genomic integrity of a cell by carrying out essential DNA repair functions via double-strand break repair pathways. Mutations in the RAD class of proteins show high susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers; however, adequate research on the mutations identified in these genes has not been extensively reported for their deleterious effects. Changes in the folding pattern of RAD proteins play an important role in protein-protein interactions and also functions. Missense mutations identified from four cancer databases, cBioPortal, COSMIC, ClinVar, and gnomAD, cause aberrant conformations, which may lead to faulty DNA repair mechanisms. It is therefore necessary to evaluate the effects of pathogenic mutations of RAD proteins and their subsequent role in breast and ovarian cancers. In this study, we have used eight computational prediction servers to analyze pathogenic mutations and understand their effects on the protein structure and function. A total of 5122 missense mutations were identified from four different cancer databases, of which 1165 were predicted to be pathogenic using at least five pathogenicity prediction servers. These mutations were characterized as high-risk mutations based on their location in the conserved domains and subsequently subjected to structural stability characterization. The mutations included in the present study were selected from clinically relevant mutants in breast cancer pedigrees. Comparative folding patterns and intra-atomic interaction results showed alterations in the structural behavior of RAD proteins, specifically RAD51C triggered by mutations G125V and L138F and RAD51D triggered by mutations S207L and E233G.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.