ArticleACS omega2023
Substrate Signal Inhibition in Raman Analysis of Microplastic Particles.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microplastic Identification Methods for Microfluidic Applications: Towards Rapid Detection in Aquatic Environments.Polymers · 2026Review
- Electrodeposited Co and Ni Hexacyanoferrates: Insights into Structure and Morphology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Raman analysis, the substrate material serves very often for signal enhancement, especially when metallic surfaces are involved; however, in other cases, the substrate has an opposite effect as it is the source of a parasitic signal preventing the observation of the sample material of interest. This is particularly true with the advent of microfluidic devices involving either silicon or polymer surfaces. On the other hand, in a vast majority of Raman experiments, the analysis is made on a horizontal support holding the sample of interest. In our paper, we report that a simple tilting of the supporting substrate, in this case, silicon, can drastically decrease and eventually inhibit the Raman signal of the substrate material, leading to an easier observation of the target analyte of the sample, in this case, microplastic particles. This effect is very pronounced especially when looking for tiny particles. Explanation of this trend is provided thanks to a supporting experiment and further numerical simulations that suggest that the lensing effect of the particles plays an important role. These findings may be useful for Raman analysis of other microscale particles having curved shapes, including biological cells.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.