ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023
SLiM CRAB criteria revisited: temporal trends in prognosis of patients with smoldering multiple myeloma who meet the definition of 'biomarker-defined early multiple myeloma'-a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Long-Term Analysis of the GMMG-HD4 Trial in Multiple Myeloma-Patterns of Association of Chromosomal Aberrations with Response and Proliferation Determining Survival in Selecting Treatments in View of Limited Resources in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Trial
- Emergency diagnosis of multiple myeloma: a SEER-Medicare study.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Characteristics and clinical course of younger patients with asymptomatic monoclonal gammopathies.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of newly diagnosed myeloma patients with SLIM criteria : a subgroup analysis of the CASSIOPEIA study.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Superior 12-month progression-free survival with frontline DVd versus VRd in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Observational
- Review
- Serum free light chain concentration and ratio-based criterion for myeloma-defining event, in its current version, is untenable.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Diagnosis, risk stratification and management of smouldering multiple myeloma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Real-world outcomes of SLiM-only multiple myeloma: Korean Multicenter Retrospective analysis (KMM2401 study).Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Genomically Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Is Not a Distinct Entity But a Collection of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance or Multiple Myeloma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Article
- Non-coding RNAs as predictive factors of oncological outcomes in plasma cell myeloma.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Primum non nocere: a critical analysis of early intervention clinical trials in smoldering multiple myeloma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Prognostic potential of albumin to fibrinogen ratio in multiple myeloma patients.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Prevalence, detection, and clinical implications of BRAF V600E and NRAS Q61R mutations in multiple myeloma BM-FFPE tissues using digital droplet PCR.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Article
- Contextualizing results of randomized trials in smoldering myeloma.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Distinctive Characteristics of Rare Sellar Lesions Mimicking Pituitary Adenomas: A Collection of Unusual Neoplasms.Cancers · 2025Article
- Patterns of multimorbidity in older adults with multiple myeloma: An analysis of SEER-Medicare.PloS one · 2025Article
- New horizons in our understanding of precursor multiple myeloma and early interception.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024Review
- [Recurrent, painful ulcers of the lower extremities and abdomen].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Patterns of progression in a contemporary cohort of 447 patients with smoldering multiple myeloma.Blood cancer journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biomarker-defined patients with smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) were included in the diagnostic category of multiple myeloma (MM) by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) in 2014. This includes ≥60% bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs), free light chain ratio (FLCratio) ≥100, and >1 MRI-defined ≥5 mm focal lesion, also called SLiM CRAB MM. We examined whether the risk of progression of SLiM CRAB MM patients to CRAB positive MM described in recent studies differs from that reported in earlier studies published before the introduction of the new diagnostic criteria. Methods: We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis, and included studies on Embase and PubMed (01/01/2010-01/11/2022), selecting studies with digitizable progression curves. Inconsistent studies were excluded. We created forest plots using random effects models from digitized and published data and Kaplan-Meier curves. Main outcomes were median time to progression (TTP), 2-year progression risk, and odds ratios (ORs) comparing 2-year progression risks. Findings: Our meta-analysis including 11 studies with 3482 patients found an approximately 3-fold longer TTP and 50% lower 2-year progression risk of SliM CRAB MM patients in recent (published after 2014) compared with earlier studies. Median TTP in patients with ≥60% BMPCs was 30.31 months [18.71-62.93] in recent compared with 9.20 months [6.02-15.56] in earlier studies; the 2-year progression risk was 45.45% [20.12-62.75] compared with 86.21% [65.74-94.45] in the respective time periods. In patients with a FLCratio ≥ 100, the median TTP was 48.06 months [40.51-64.91] vs. 15.33 months [9.38-19.10], and the 2-year progression risk was 31.61% [25.30-37.39] vs. 73.00% [62.39-80.62] in recent and earlier studies, respectively. Tests for heterogeneity showed that the two time periods differed significantly in their ORs when comparing patients who met the high-and low risk criteria. No appropriate recent studies on focal lesions have been published. Interpretation: Recent studies show significantly improved prognosis of biomarker-defined MM with ≥60% BMPCs and FLCratio ≥ 100. This warrants careful evaluation for signs of progression before treatment initiation. Funding: Funding was provided by the Austrian Forum against Cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.