ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023
American college of radiology ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system ultrasound (O-RADS): Diagnostic performance and inter-reviewer agreement for ovarian masses in children.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Inter-reader reliability of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System US: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for classifying benign and malignant pediatric adnexal lesions using ultrasound.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Ultrasonographic assessment of pediatric adnexal lesions: validation of the O-RADS system and development of a simplified C-CAS framework.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical Features of Surgically Managed Adnexal Masses in Children and Adolescents at a Tertiary Referral Center.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessment of ultrasound ovarian-adnexal reporting & data system (O-RADS) for pediatric patients.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Age-stratified diagnostic performance of the ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system for adnexal masses: a focus on school-age children, early, and middle adolescents.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Imaging Evaluation of Ovarian Masses in a Pediatric Population: A Comprehensive Overview.Cancers · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Screening Methods for Ovarian Masses: Towards Earlier Detection.Cureus · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and inter-observer agreement of the American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS) in the diagnosis of ovarian masses in children. Methods: From June 2012 to December 2021, 163 ovarian masses in 159 patients with pathologic results were retrospectively analyzed. Each mass was classified into an O-RADS category according to the criteria. The diagnostic performance of O-RADS for detecting malignant ovarian masses was assessed using histopathology as the reference standard. Kappa ( Results: Out of 163 ovarian masses, 18 (11.0%) were malignant and 145 (89.0%) were benign. The malignancy rates of O-RADS 5, O-RADS 4, and O-RADS 3 masses were 72.7%, 34.6%, and 4.8%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.944 (95% CI, 0.908-0.981). The optimal cutoff value for predicting malignant ovarian masses was > O-RADS 3 with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 94.4%, 86.2% and 86.2% respectively. The inter-observer agreement of the O-RADS category was good ( Conclusions: O-RADS has a high diagnostic performance for children with ovarian masses. It provides an effective malignant risk classification for ovarian masses in children, which shows high consistency between radiologists with different levels of experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.