Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36969135›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2023

Large-scale genetic surveys for main extant population of wild giant panda (

Wanyu Li, Chuang Zhou, Meiling Cheng, Hongmei Tu, Guannan Wang, Yeming Mao, Yaohua Huang, Minghua Chen, Megan Price, Yang Meng and 2 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wanyu LiKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences Sichuan University Chengdu China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9764-9759
Chuang ZhouKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences Sichuan University Chengdu China.
Meiling ChengSichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences Sichuan University Chengdu China.
Hongmei TuKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences Sichuan University Chengdu China.
Guannan WangKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences Sichuan University Chengdu China.
Yeming MaoSichuan Heizhugou National Nature Reserve Administration Ebian China.
Yaohua HuangSichuan Mabian National Nature Reserve Administration Leshan China.
Minghua ChenSichuan Meigu National Nature Reserve Administration Meigu China.
Megan PriceKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences Sichuan University Chengdu China.
Yang MengKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences Sichuan University Chengdu China.
Bisong YueKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences Sichuan University Chengdu China.
Xiuyue ZhangKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences Sichuan University Chengdu China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are only six isolated living giant panda populations, and a comprehensive understanding of their genetic health status is crucial for the conservation of this vulnerable species. Liangshan Mountains is one of the main distribution areas of living giant pandas and is outside the newly established Giant panda national park. In this study, 971 giant panda fecal samples were collected in the heartland of Liangshan Mountains (Mabian Dafengding Nature Reserve: MB; Meigu Dafengding Nature Reserve: MG; and Heizhugou Nature Reserve: HZG). Microsatellite markers and mitochondrial D-loop sequences were used to estimate population size and genetic diversity. We identified 92 individuals (MB: 27, MG: 22, HZG: 43) from the three reserves. Our results showed that: (1) genetic diversity of three giant panda populations was moderate; (2) several loci deviated significantly from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and almost all these deviated loci showed significant heterozygote deficiencies and inbreeding; (3) three giant panda populations have substantial genetic differentiation with the most differentiation between MB and the two other populations; and (4) a large amount of giant panda feces outside the three reserves were found, implying the existence of protection gap. These results indicated that under stochastic events, the giant panda populations in Liangshan Mountains are at risk of genetic decline or extinction and urgent need of human management. This study revealed that high attention should be paid to the protection of these giant panda populations outside the Giant panda national park, to ensure their survival in their distribution areas.

Indexed as

Ailuropoda melanoleucaconservationgenetic differentiationgenetic diversityLiangshan Mountainspopulation size

Identifiers

PMID36969135
PMCPMC10033846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read19
table measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.