Covid-19: did higher trust societies fare better?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Trust in doctors, social support, and belief in COVID-19 misinformation.BMC public health · 2025
   Article
2. Analysis of key factors and equity in influenza vaccination among Chinese adults-evidence from a large national cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in public health · 2025
   Article
3. Understanding vaccine hesitancy through the lens of trust and the 3C model: evidence from Chinese General Social Survey 2021.Frontiers in public health · 2025
   Article
4. Sociopolitical context and COVID-19 fatality rates in OECD countries: a configurational approach.BMC public health · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract