Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36969047›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Fully automated bladder tumor segmentation from T2 MRI images using 3D U-Net algorithm.

Diana Mihaela Coroamă, Laura Dioșan, Teodora Telecan, Iulia Andras, Nicolae Crișan, Paul Medan, Anca Andreica, Cosmin Caraiani, Andrei Lebovici, Bianca Boca and 1 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Diana Mihaela CoroamăFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Laura DioșanFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Teodora TelecanDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Iulia AndrasDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Nicolae CrișanDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Paul MedanDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Anca AndreicaFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Cosmin CaraianiDepartment of Medical Imaging, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Andrei LeboviciDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Bianca BocaDepartment of Medical Imaging, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Zoltán BálintDepartment of Biomolecular Physics, Faculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bladder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been recently integrated in the diagnosis pathway of bladder cancer. However, automatic recognition of suspicious lesions is still challenging. Thus, development of a solution for proper delimitation of the tumor and its separation from the healthy tissue is of primordial importance. As a solution to this unmet medical need, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence-based decision support system, which automatically segments the bladder wall and the tumor as well as any suspect area from the 3D MRI images. Materials: We retrospectively assessed all patients diagnosed with bladder cancer, who underwent MRI at our department (n=33). All examinations were performed using a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner. All images were reviewed by two radiologists, who performed manual segmentation of the bladder wall and all lesions. First, the performance of our fully automated end-to-end segmentation model based on a 3D U-Net architecture (by considering various depths of 4, 5 or 6 blocks) trained in two data augmentation scenarios (on 5 and 10 augmentation datasets per original data, respectively) was tested. Second, two learning setups were analyzed by training the segmentation algorithm with 7 and 14 MRI original volumes, respectively. Results: We obtained a Dice-based performance over 0.878 for automatic segmentation of bladder wall and tumors, as compared to manual segmentation. A larger training dataset using 10 augmentations for 7 patients could further improve the results of the U-Net-5 model (0.902 Dice coefficient at image level). This model performed best in terms of automated segmentation of bladder, as compared to U-Net-4 and U-Net-6. However, in this case increased time for learning was needed as compared to U-Net-4. We observed that an extended dataset for training led to significantly improved segmentation of the bladder wall, but not of the tumor. Conclusion: We developed an intelligent system for bladder tumors automated diagnostic, that uses a deep learning model to segment both the bladder wall and the tumor. As a conclusion, low complexity networks, with less than five-layers U-Net architecture are feasible and show good performance for automatic 3D MRI image segmentation in patients with bladder tumors.

Indexed as

bladder cancerconvolutional neuronal network (CNN)fully automatic 3D image segmentationlight 3D U-NetT2 MRI images

Identifiers

PMID36969047
PMCPMC10033524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read31
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.