Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36969032›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

M1 macrophage predicted efficacy of neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for locally advanced ESCC: A pilot study.

Shu Wang, Guanghui Xu, Mengbin Li, Jiyang Zheng, Yuhao Wang, Xiangying Feng, Jialin Luo, Shibo Wang, Huan Liu, Weiming Duan and 5 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Harnessing biomarkers to guide immunotherapy in esophageal cancer: toward precision oncology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Novel FABP4Cell death & disease · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shu WangState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xi-jing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Guanghui XuState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xi-jing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Mengbin LiState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xi-jing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Jiyang ZhengState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xi-jing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yuhao WangState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xi-jing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Xiangying FengState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xi-jing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Jialin LuoState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xi-jing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Shibo WangState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xi-jing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Huan LiuState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xi-jing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Weiming DuanThe Medical Department, 3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China.
Hushan ZhangThe Medical Department, 3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China.
Depei HuangThe Medical Department, 3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China.
Feilong ZhaoThe Medical Department, 3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China.
Yongzhan NieState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xi-jing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Jianjun YangState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xi-jing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Air Force Medical University · CNXijing Hospital · CNNational Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy have been widely recognized in gastrointestinal-related cancers. However, the efficacy of neoadjuvant camrelizumab for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been firmly established. This study compared the efficacy of camrelizumab in combination with neoadjuvant DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil), with DCF alone for ESCC, and exploring biomarkers related to immune infiltration of the ESCC immunotherapy response. Methods: We enrolled and randomly assigned patients with stage II-IVa ESCC to two study treatments: camrelizumab combined with docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) regimen and DCF regimen alone. The tissue for multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) was obtained before and after neoadjuvant therapy. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors RECIST Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) and Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) was used to evaluate efficacy. Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled in the study. Following neoadjuvant camrelizumab, the objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 46.7% (7/15) and 95.7% (14/15), respectively. No patients reported complete remission, while ORR and DCR in the chemotherapy group were 26.7% (4/15) and 86.7% (13/15), respectively. R0 resection after neoadjuvant treatment was achieved in 3 out of 15 patients in the combined group and in all patients (15/15) in the chemotherapy group. In the combined group, M1-type tumor-associated macrophages and CD56dim NK cells were more abundant in responders than in non-responders (p < 0.05). A higher M1/M2 ratio was observed in responders (p < 0.05). With respect to the NGS, among the copy number amplified genes, the 11q13 amplicon (CCND1/FGF19/FGF4/FGF3) showed the highest frequency (47%, 7/15). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy improved ORR in locally advanced ESCC. M1-type tumor-associated macrophages and CD56dim NK cells might be utilized to predict camrelizumab efficacy.

Indexed as

camrelizumabesophageal squamous cell carcinomaimmune microenvironmentM1 macrophageneoadjuvant therapy

Identifiers

PMID36969032
PMCPMC10038194
OpenAlexW4323833657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read70
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.