Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36968970›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2023

High-dose Cefepime vs Carbapenems for Bacteremia Caused by Enterobacterales With Moderate to High Risk of Clinically Significant AmpC β-lactamase Production.

Ashlan J Kunz Coyne, Amer El Ghali, Kristen Lucas, Paige Witucki, Nicholas Rebold, Dana J Holger, Michael P Veve, Michael J Rybak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashlan J Kunz CoyneWayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4891-8625
Amer El GhaliWayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1744-0048
Kristen LucasWayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7700-151X
Paige WituckiAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Nicholas ReboldWayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5469-1228
Dana J HolgerWayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7171-7015
Michael P VeveWayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5967-5211
Michael J RybakWayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2220-0081
Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Limited data suggest that serious infections caused by Enterobacterales with a moderate to high risk of clinically significant AmpC production can be successfully treated with cefepime if the cefepime minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is ≤2 µg/mL. However, isolates with a cefepime-susceptible dose-dependent (SDD) MIC of 4-8 µg/mL should receive a carbapenem due to target attainment and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) concerns. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with Results: Of the 315 patients included, 169 received cefepime and 146 received a carbapenem (ertapenem n = 90, meropenem n = 56). Cefepime was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality compared with carbapenem therapy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.45; 95% CI, 0.79-2.14), which was consistent for patients with cefepime SDD isolates (aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.52-1.77). Multivariable weighted Cox models identified Pitt bacteremia score >4 (aHR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04-1.92), deep infection (aHR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.21-4.32), and ceftriaxone-resistant AmpC-E (aHR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.03-1.59) to be independent predictors associated with increased mortality risk, while receipt of prolonged-infusion β-lactam was protective (aHR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.40-0.89). Conclusions: Among patients with bacteremia caused by Enterobacterales with moderate to high risk of clinically significant AmpC production, these data demonstrate similar risk of 30-day mortality for high-dose cefepime or a carbapenem as definitive β-lactam therapy.

Indexed as

ampC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteralesantimicrobial stewardshipbacteremiacarbapenemcefepimepropensity scoretime-varying analysis

Identifiers

PMID36968970
PMCPMC10034593
OpenAlexW4318173854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.