ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
A CNN-LSTM model for six human ankle movements classification on different loads.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning for motion classification in ankle exoskeletons using surface EMG and IMU signals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mitigating the Impact of Electrode Shift on Classification Performance in Electromyography Applications Using Sliding-Window Normalization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- sEMG-based gesture recognition using multi-stream adaptive CNNs with integrated residual modules.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Multivariate Modelling and Prediction of High-Frequency Sensor-Based Cerebral Physiologic Signals: Narrative Review of Machine Learning Methodologies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to address three problems in current studies in decoding the ankle movement intention for robot-assisted bilateral rehabilitation using surface electromyogram (sEMG) signals: (1) only up to four ankle movements could be identified while six ankle movements should be classified to provide better training; (2) feeding the raw sEMG signals directly into the neural network leads to high computational cost; and (3) load variation has large influence on classification accuracy. To achieve this, a convolutional neural network (CNN)-long short-term memory (LSTM) model, a time-domain feature selection method of the sEMG, and a two-step method are proposed. For the first time, the Boruta algorithm is used to select time-domain features of sEMG. The selected features, rather than raw sEMG signals are fed into the CNN-LSTM model. Hence, the number of model's parameters is reduced from 331,938 to 155,042, by half. Experiments are conducted to validate the proposed method. The results show that our method could classify six ankle movements with relatively good accuracy (95.73%). The accuracy of CNN-LSTM, CNN, and LSTM models with sEMG features as input are all higher than that of corresponding models with raw sEMG as input. The overall accuracy is improved from 73.23% to 93.50% using our two-step method for identifying the ankle movements with different loads. Our proposed CNN-LSTM model have the highest accuracy for ankle movements classification compared with CNN, LSTM, and Support Vector Machine (SVM).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.