ArticleCureus2023
Distal Radius Extra-Articular Fractures: The Impact of Anatomical Alignment on Patient's Perceived Outcome (A Single Center Experience).
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe effects of the anatomical alignment of distal radial extra-articular fractures on the patient's perceived outcome have been drawing much attention recently, and much controversy exists in the literature. The primary purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the radiological parameters of reduction (radial inclination, radial length, and radial tilt) and the patient's perceived functional outcome, which was quantified using the DASH questionnaire.
methodsThe study included one hundred twenty-four patients with distal radial extra-articular fractures managed by closed reduction and casting. Their radiological (anatomical) outcome was determined by measuring the radial inclination, tilt, and length. Subjective functional outcome was quantified using the DASH score, calculated from the Arabic-translated DASH questionnaire at three months and six months after cast removal.
resultsthe mean DASH score was 31.56 SD± 9.1 at three months and 29 SD± 3.89 at six months, and the acceptable radiological results for radial tilt, radial inclination, and radial length (according to McDermid's criteria for acceptable reduction) were 77.4%, 88.7% and 74.4%, respectively. There was a significant linear correlation between two radiological parameters (radial tilt and radial length) and the DASH score at three-month follow-up, which was more profound among patients under 70 years old and with diabetes mellitus. At the six-month follow-up, there was no significant relationship between the radiological parameters and the DASH score.
conclusionThis study confirmed that radiological outcome affects the early patient-perceived outcome, with a more significant effect among patients under 70 and diabetics. Nonetheless, over time, there will be no significant relationship between the quality of reduction and patients' perceived outcomes. And this phenomenon requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.