Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36968600›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2023

Case report: Detection of fetal trisomy 9 mosaicism by multiple genetic testing methods: Report of two cases.

Na Ma, Zhenhua Zhu, Jiancheng Hu, Jialun Pang, Shuting Yang, Jing Liu, Jing Chen, Wanglan Tang, Haiyan Kuang, Rong Hu and 4 more

Open access · goldFull text readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Non-Mosaic Trisomy 9: Further Delineation of the Clinical Phenotype.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Na MaDepartment of Medical Genetics, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Changsha, China.
Zhenhua ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, Changsha Central Hospital Affiliated to University of South China, Changsha, China.
Jiancheng HuDepartment of Medical Genetics, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Changsha, China.
Jialun PangDepartment of Medical Genetics, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Changsha, China.
Shuting YangDepartment of Medical Genetics, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Changsha, China.
Jing LiuDepartment of Medical Genetics, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Changsha, China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Medical Genetics, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Changsha, China.
Wanglan TangDepartment of Medical Genetics, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Changsha, China.
Haiyan KuangDepartment of Ultrasonography, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Changsha, China.
Rong HuDepartment of Medical Genetics, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Changsha, China.
Zhuo LiCenter for Medical Genetics and Hunan Key Laboratory of Medical Genetics School of Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hua WangDepartment of Medical Genetics, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, China.
Ying PengDepartment of Medical Genetics, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Changsha, China.
Hui XiDepartment of Medical Genetics, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Changsha, China.
Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNCentral South University · CNChangsha Central Hospital · CNHunan Children's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal mosaicism remains a perpetual diagnostic and clinical dilemma. In the present study, we detected two prenatal trisomy 9 mosaic syndrome cases by using multiple genetic testing methods. The non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results suggested trisomy 9 in two fetuses. Karyotype analysis of amniocytes showed a high level (42%-50%) of mosaicism, and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) of uncultured amniocytes showed no copy number variation (CNV) except for large fragment loss of heterozygosity. Ultrasound findings were unmarkable except for small for gestational age. In Case 1, further umbilical blood puncture confirmed 22.4% and 34% trisomy 9 mosaicism by CMA and fluorescent

Indexed as

chromosomal microarray analysiscopy number variation sequencingkaryotypemosaicismnon-invasive prenatal testingtrisomy 9

Identifiers

PMID36968600
PMCPMC10036773
OpenAlexW4323858844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read42
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.