ReviewEngineering biology2022
Biologically engineered microbes for bioremediation of electronic waste: Wayposts, challenges and future directions.
Review in Engineering biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic Design Patterns for a Regenerative Architecture.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Review
- Co-Bioleaching of Pyrite Flotation Tailings and Crushed Printed Circuit Boards.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Microbes Saving Lives and Reducing Suffering.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- A Review of the Occurrence and Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Electronic Waste.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Biosecurity Assessments for Emerging Transdisciplinary Biotechnologies: Revisiting Biodefense in an Age of Synthetic Biology.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2024Review
- Article
- Biologically engineered microbes for bioremediation of electronic waste: Wayposts, challenges and future directions.Engineering biology · 2022Review
- Corrigendum: Biologically engineered microbes for bioremediation of electronic waste: Wayposts, challenges and future directions.Engineering biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the face of a burgeoning stream of e-waste globally, e-waste recycling becomes increasingly imperative, not only to mitigate the environmental and health risks it poses but also as an urban mining strategy for resource recovery of precious metals, rare Earth elements, and even plastics. As part of the continual efforts to develop greener alternatives to conventional approaches of e-waste recycling, biologically assisted degradation of e-waste offers a promising recourse by capitalising on certain microorganisms' innate ability to interact with metals or degrade plastics. By harnessing emerging genetic tools in synthetic biology, the evolution of novel or enhanced capabilities needed to advance bioremediation and resource recovery could be potentially accelerated by improving enzyme catalytic abilities, modifying substrate specificities, and increasing toxicity tolerance. Yet, the management of e-waste presents formidable challenges due to its massive volume, high component complexity, and associated toxicity. Several limitations will need to be addressed before nascent laboratory-scale achievements in bioremediation can be translated to viable industrial applications. Nonetheless, vested groups, involving both start-up and established companies, have taken visionary steps towards deploying microbes for commercial implementation in e-waste recycling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.