Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36968477›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

The comparison and use of tools for quantification of antimicrobial use in Indonesian broiler farms.

Rianna Anwar Sani, Jaap A Wagenaar, Tagrid E H A Dinar, Sunandar Sunandar, Nofita Nurbiyanti, Imron Suandy, Gian Pertela, Elvina J Jahja, Budi Purwanto, CORNERSTONE group and 2 more

Erratum issuedFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rianna Anwar SaniDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Jaap A WagenaarDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Tagrid E H A DinarDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Sunandar SunandarCenter for Indonesian Veterinary Analytical Studies (CIVAS), Bogor, Indonesia.
Nofita NurbiyantiCenter for Indonesian Veterinary Analytical Studies (CIVAS), Bogor, Indonesia.
Imron SuandyMinistry of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Gian PertelaLaboratory Services and Surveillance Department, PT Medion Farma Jaya, Bandung, Indonesia.
Elvina J JahjaAnimal Health Department, PT Medion Farma Jaya, Bandung, Indonesia.
Budi PurwantoTechnical Education and Consultation Department, PT Medion Ardhika Bhakti, Bandung, Indonesia.
CORNERSTONE group
Ingeborg M van GeijlswijkDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
David C SpeksnijderDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Indonesia has a large broiler industry with extensive antimicrobial use (AMU) according to empirical evidence. However, there are no quantitative data of on-farm AMU. Quantification of AMU at farm level is crucial to guide interventions on antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). The objective of this study was to compare on-farm AMU monitoring methods, to assess which monitoring method is best suited to gain insight in the quantitative AMU at farm level in medium-scale Indonesian broiler farms. Method: AMU was calculated using four different indicators-mg/PCU (mass-based), TF Results: Broilers were exposed to an average of 10 days of antimicrobial treatments per production cycle, whereas 60.8% of the antimicrobials belonged to the Highest Priority Critically Important Antimicrobials (HPCIAs). For each pair of indicators, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient was calculated to assess if the production cycles were ranked consistently in increasing AMU across the different indicators. The correlation varied between 0.4 and 0.8. Discussion: This study illustrates the considerable difference in the ranking of AMU between the different indicators. In a setting comparable to medium-scale broiler farms in Indonesia, where resources are scarce and there is no professional oversight, the TF

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshipIndonesiapoultryveterinary antimicrobial use monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36968477
PMCPMC10036347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read22
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.