Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36968455›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2023

Machine learning approaches and non-linear processing of extracted components in frontal region to predict rTMS treatment response in major depressive disorder.

Elias Ebrahimzadeh, Farahnaz Fayaz, Lila Rajabion, Masoud Seraji, Fatemeh Aflaki, Ahmad Hammoud, Zahra Taghizadeh, Mostafa Asgarinejad, Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Elias EbrahimzadehSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Farahnaz FayazBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Electrical Engineering, Payame Noor University of North Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Lila RajabionSchool of Graduate Studies, SUNY Empire State College, Manhattan, NY, United States.
Masoud SerajiDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Fatemeh AflakiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad HammoudDepartment of Medical and Technical Information Technology, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia.
Zahra TaghizadehDepartment of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.
Mostafa AsgarinejadDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute for Cognitive Sciences Studies, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid Soltanian-ZadehSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences · IRBauman Moscow State Technical University · RUEmpire State University · USGeorge Mason University · USInstitute for Cognitive Science Studies · IRIslamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch · IRPayame Noor University · IRThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the therapeutic result of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment could save time and costs as ineffective treatment can be avoided. To this end, we presented a machine-learning-based strategy for classifying patients with major depression disorder (MDD) into responders (R) and nonresponders (NR) to rTMS treatment. Resting state EEG data were recorded using 32 electrodes from 88 MDD patients before treatment. Then, patients underwent 7 weeks of rTMS, and 46 of them responded to treatment. By applying Independent Component Analysis (ICA) on EEG, we identified the relevant brain sources as possible indicators of neural activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). This was served through estimating the generators of activity in the sensor domain. Subsequently, we added physiological information and placed certain terms and conditions to offer a far more realistic estimation than the classic EEG. Ultimately, those components mapped in accordance with the region of the DLPFC in the sensor domain were chosen. Features extracted from the relevant ICs time series included permutation entropy (PE), fractal dimension (FD), Lempel-Ziv Complexity (LZC), power spectral density, correlation dimension (CD), features based on bispectrum, frontal and prefrontal cordance, and a combination of them. The most relevant features were selected by a Genetic Algorithm (GA). For classifying two groups of R and NR, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) were applied to predict rTMS treatment response. To evaluate the performance of classifiers, a 10-fold cross-validation method was employed. A statistical test was used to assess the capability of features in differentiating R and NR for further research. EEG characteristics that can predict rTMS treatment response were discovered. The strongest discriminative indicators were EEG beta power, the sum of bispectrum diagonal elements in delta and beta bands, and CD. The Combined feature vector classified R and NR with a high performance of 94.31% accuracy, 92.85% specificity, 95.65% sensitivity, and 92.85% precision using SVM. This result indicates that our proposed method with power and nonlinear and bispectral features from relevant ICs time-series can predict the treatment outcome of rTMS for MDD patients only by one session pretreatment EEG recording. The obtained results show that the proposed method outperforms previous methods.

Indexed as

classificationelectroencephalography (EEG)independent component analysis (ICA)machine learning approachesmajor depressive disorder (MDD)non-linear processingprediction treatment responserepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Identifiers

PMID36968455
PMCPMC10034109
OpenAlexW4323847236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read92
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.