Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36968218›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2023

Impact of adjuvant sorafenib treatment after local ablation for HCC in the phase II SORAMIC trial.

Max Seidensticker, Osman Öcal, Kerstin Schütte, Peter Malfertheiner, Thomas Berg, Christian Loewe, Heinz Josef Klümpen, Otto van Delden, Muzaffer Reha Ümütlü, Najib Ben Khaled and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01126645 (Evaluation of Sorafenib in Combination With Local Micro-therapy Guided by Gd-EOB-DTPA Enhanced MRI in Patients With Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01126645 phase2completednot on this map

Evaluation of Sorafenib in Combination With Local Micro-therapy Guided by Gd-EOB-DTPA Enhanced MRI in Patients With Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MagdeburgRan2010 to 2018Enrolled529ConditionsHepatocellular CarcinomaArmsRFA, Radioembolization (SIRT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Sorafenib with or without co-interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Max SeidenstickerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Osman ÖcalDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Kerstin SchütteDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken Marienhospital, Osnabrück, Germany.
Peter MalfertheinerDepartment of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas BergKlinik und Poliklinik für Gastroenterologie, Sektion Hepatologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Germany.
Christian LoeweSection of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Heinz Josef KlümpenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Otto van DeldenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Muzaffer Reha ÜmütlüDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Najib Ben KhaledDepartment of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Enrico Narciso de ToniDepartment of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ricarda SeidenstickerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ali AghdassiDepartment of Medicine A, University Medicine Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany.
Albert TranPôle Appareil Digestif, Hôpital l'Archet 2, CHU Nice, Route Saint-Antoine de Ginestière - BP 3079, Nice, France.
Jean-Pierre BronowickiDepartment of Hepatology, INSERM U1254, Hôpital de Brabois, CHU de Nancy, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Bora PeynirciogluDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Bruno SangroLiver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain.
Maciej PechDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jens RickeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DEAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESHacettepe University Hospital · TRHôpital l'Archet · FRInserm · FRMarienhospital Osnabrück · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant sorafenib treatment compared with placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent local ablation. Methods: The SORAMIC trial is a randomised controlled trial with diagnostic, local ablation, and palliative sub-study arms. After initial imaging within the diagnostic study, patients were assigned to local ablation or palliative arms. In the local ablation cohort, patients were randomised 1:1 to local ablation + sorafenib Results: The recruitment was terminated prematurely after 104 patients owing to slow recruitment. One patient was excluded because of a technical failure. Fifty-four patients were randomised to local ablation + sorafenib and 49 to local ablation + placebo. Eighty-eight patients who underwent standardised follow-up imaging comprised the per-protocol population. The median TTR was 15.2 months in the sorafenib arm and 16.4 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio 1.1; 95% CI 0.53-2.2; Conclusions: Adjuvant sorafenib did not improve in TTR or local control rate after local ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within the limitations of an early terminated trial. Impact and implications: Local ablation is the standard of care treatment in patients with early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma, along with surgical therapies. However, there is a risk of disease recurrence during follow-up. Sorafenib, an oral medication, is a routinely used treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This study found that sorafenib treatment after local ablation in people with early hepatocellular carcinoma did not significantly improve the disease-free period compared with placebo. Clinical trial number: EudraCT 2009-012576-27, NCT01126645.

Indexed as

AdjuvantBCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver CancerCONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting TrialsCT, computed tomographyECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance StatusHCC, hepatocellular carcinomaHepatocellular carcinomaHR, hazard ratioITT, intention-to-treatLocal ablationMRI, magnetic resonance imagingMWA, microwave ablationPP, per protocolRFA, radiofrequency ablationRFS, relapse-free survivalSIRT, selective internal radiation therapySorafenibSORAMIC, SORAfenib in combination with local MICro-therapy guided by gadolinium-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRITime-to-recurrenceTTR, time-to-recurrence

Identifiers

PMID36968218
PMCPMC10031000
OpenAlexW4320923059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.