Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36967916›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Using objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for circulating and scrub skills of first-semester operating room technology students: Is it valid and reliable?

Morteza Nasiri, Shahrzad Yektatalab, Marzieh Momennasab, Fatemeh Vizeshfar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Morteza NasiriStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shahrzad YektatalabCommunity-based Psychiatric Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Marzieh MomennasabCommunity-based Psychiatric Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Fatemeh VizeshfarCommunity-based Psychiatric Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) developed for the summative assessment of the practical credit of the course titled "Principles and Techniques of Circulating and Scrub Persons' Practice." Methods: This applied descriptive study was conducted on 63 first-semester undergraduate Operating Room (OR) technology students. Totally, 17 circulating and scrub skills were incorporated in four 7-min OSCE stations. The content validity of the examination was assessed by an expert panel (n = 14). Additionally, its concurrent validity was evaluated by Intra-Class Correlation (ICC) through measuring the correlation between the total score of OSCE and grade point average, grades of the practical and theoretical credits of the course that were obtained by multiple-choice tests, and the total grade of the course (achieved by the grades of the practical and theoretical credits tests). The Inter-Rater Reliability (IRR) was also calculated by the correlation between the scores recorded by two examiners at each OSCE station using ICC. Meanwhile, the internal consistency across stations (item-total correlation) and across items within a station was determined by Cronbach's alpha (α). Results: The OSCE was deemed to fulfill the content validity criteria. The total score of OSCE showed a significant correlation with the concurrent validity criteria (ICC = 0.66-0.85, p < 0.001). Besides, the IRR was significant for the total score of OSCE as well as for the score of each station (ICC = 0.90-0.98, p < 0.001). Likewise, a good level of internal consistency was found across stations (α = 0.63-0.93) and across items within a station (α = 0.78-0.92). Conclusion: The developed OSCE had appropriate validity and reliability. Thus, it can be used to assess the circulating and scrub skills of first-semester OR technology students.

Indexed as

Objective structured clinical examinationPerioperative nursingReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID36967916
PMCPMC10031320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.