ArticleHeliyon2023
Development of two smart acoustic yam quality detection devices using a machine learning approach.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic enhancement of root, tuber and cereal crops via pangenomics, multi-omics integration and AI-driven prediction.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality detection has been a major problem in the agriculture and food industries. This operation is mostly done by a subjective sensory method which is prone to high error and food destruction. Therefore, there is a need to apply artificial intelligence using a machine learning approach. This study developed two intelligent acoustic yam quality detection and classification devices using two sound-generating techniques. The software (multi-wave frequency generator) sound-generating technique generated sound from a laptop to a speaker inside a detecting chamber. This sound passes through the yam and was received on the opposite side by a microphone, into another laptop for analysis using visual analyzer software. The impact sound-generating technique used sound generated from a gentle impact of the yam on a flat surface placed inside the detection chamber. The sound produced was picked up by a microphone into a laptop for analysis. Acoustic properties considered were amplitude, frequency, sound velocity, wavelength, period and sound intensity. Discriminant analysis algorithm only was used in this first stage of the study to prove the applicability of machine learning. Three qualities (good, diseased damaged and insect-damaged) of two yam varieties (white and yellow yam) were tested. The device's performance of white yam was 79% and 68.7%, yellow yam was 82.3% and 68.7% for the software sound generation-technique and surface impact sound-generating technique, respectively. The study shows that the software sound-generating technique performed better in terms of overall yam quality detection and also proves the applicability of machine learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.