Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36967883›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Establishing an effective clinical data collecting tool for optimal evaluation of native and allograft renal biopsies.

Shifaa' Al Qa'qa', Rehab Al-Fatani, Sonia Rodriguez-Ramirez, Prakash Gudsoorkar, Laurette Geldenhuys, Carmen Avila-Casado

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Shifaa' Al Qa'qa'Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt, Jordan.
Rehab Al-FataniLaboratory and Blood Bank Administration, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Sonia Rodriguez-RamirezDivision of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Prakash GudsoorkarDivision of Nephrology & Kidney Clinical Advancement, Research & Education (C.A.R.E.) Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA.
Laurette GeldenhuysDepartment of Pathology, Dalhousie University, and Central Zone, Nova Scotia Health, Canada.
Carmen Avila-CasadoLaboratory Medicine Program, Anatomic Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University Health Network · CAAl-Balqa Applied University · JOHealth Canada · CAKing Abdullah Medical City · SAUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous kidney biopsy is the gold standard method to reach a precise diagnosis in most medical kidney diseases, which positively impacts patient care by personalizing the treatment. Accurate diagnosis in the pathology report for medical kidney diseases requires clinicopathological correlation, and clinical data is not always reachable to the nephropathologist. This study aimed to create a standardized, paperless requisition form compatible with medical renal biopsies. Methods: An initial form was prepared for native and allograft renal biopsies according to the current classification of medical kidney diseases. We invited 33 nephropathologists working in Canadian healthcare institutions to answer survey questions about the need to include a particular aspect of clinical information. According to the responses, we modified the experimental form. Eighty nephrologists were asked to complete a clinical data-collecting form given out as PDF files. The time for completing the form and clinicians' satisfaction were assessed. Results: The experimental form survey was answered by 20 out of 33 nephropathologists (61%) from 14 Canadian healthcare centers. The agreement rate on the questions was from 38.89% to 100.00% (average 83.33% and 77.14% for the native and the allograft section, respectively). Seventeen out of 80 nephrologists and their assistants (21%) responded by completing 22 PDF forms. The time required to finish a PDF form was 10.4 min on average. Nephrologists considered the form time-consuming and suggested making it more clinically relevant. Only seven nephrologists responded to the satisfaction survey; four (57%) were satisfied. Conclusions: Medical information is critical in renal pathology diagnoses. A uniform paperless clinical data requisition form was evolved through an agreement by Canadian nephropathologists.

Indexed as

Clinical dataCollecting formEffectiveElectronicQuality improvementRenal biopsy

Identifiers

PMID36967883
PMCPMC10031327
OpenAlexW4323670147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.