Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36967881›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Identifying steady state in the network dynamics of spiking neural networks.

Vivek Kurien George, Arkin Gupta, Gabriel A Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vivek Kurien GeorgeDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92037, United States of America.
Arkin GuptaDepartment of Computer and Electrical Engineering, University of California San Diego, United States of America.
Gabriel A SilvaDepartments of Bioengineering and Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of the dynamics of complex networks can provide valuable information. For example, the dynamics can be used to characterize and differentiate between different network inputs and configurations. However, without quantitatively delineating the network's dynamic regimes, analysis of the network's dynamics is based on heuristics and qualitative signatures of transient or steady-state regimes. This is not ideal because interesting phenomena can occur during the transient regime, steady-state regime, or at the transition between the two dynamic regimes. Moreover, for simulated and observed systems, precise knowledge of the network's dynamical regime is imperative when considering metrics on minimal mathematical descriptions of the dynamics, otherwise either too much or too little data is analyzed. Here, we develop quantitative methods to ascertain the starting point and period of steady-state network activity. Using the precise knowledge of the network's dynamic regimes, we build minimal representations of the network dynamics that form the basis for future work. We show applications of our techniques on idealized signals and on the dynamics of a biologically inspired spiking neural network.

Indexed as

Complex networksNetwork dynamicsNetwork evolutionPeriodicity detectionRepresentation of network dynamicsSpiking neural networksSymbolic dynamics

Identifiers

PMID36967881
PMCPMC10036509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.