Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36967794›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Value of machine learning-based transrectal multimodal ultrasound combined with PSA-related indicators in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Maoliang Zhang, Yuanzhen Liu, Jincao Yao, Kai Wang, Jing Tu, Zhengbiao Hu, Yun Jin, Yue Du, Xingbo Sun, Liyu Chen and 1 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maoliang ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.
Yuanzhen LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Jincao YaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Kai WangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.
Jing TuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.
Zhengbiao HuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.
Yun JinDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.
Yue DuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.
Xingbo SunDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.
Liyu ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Zhengping WangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of transrectal multimodal ultrasound combined with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-related indicators and machine learning for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Methods: Based on Gleason score of postoperative pathological results, the subjects were divided into clinically significant prostate cancer groups(GS>6)and non-clinically significant prostate cancer groups(GS ≤ 6). The independent risk factors were obtained by univariate logistic analysis. Artificial neural network (ANN), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) machine learning models were combined with clinically significant prostate cancer risk factors to establish the machine learning model, calculate the model evaluation indicators, construct the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and calculate the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Independent risk factor items (P< 0.05) were entered into the machine learning model. A comparison of the evaluation indicators of the model and the area under the ROC curve showed the ANN model to be best at predicting clinically significant prostate cancer, with a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 88.6%, F1 score of 0.897, and the AUC was 0.855. Conclusion: Establishing a machine learning model by rectal multimodal ultrasound and combining it with PSA-related indicators has definite application value in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMachine LearningMaleNeural Networks, ComputerROC CurveProstate-Specific Antigenartificial neural networkclinically significant prostate cancermachine learningmultimodal ultrasoundserum prostate specific antigen

Identifiers

PMID36967794
PMCPMC10031096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read15
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.