Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36967790›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Transdermal estrogen gel vs oral estrogen after hysteroscopy for intrauterine adhesion separation: A prospective randomized study.

Tianjin Yi, Xiaofang Zhang, Vani Gupta, Li Li, Qian Zhong

Open access · goldFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. New advances in the treatment of thin endometrium.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Stem cell therapy targets THBS1 to reverse endometrial fibrosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tianjin YiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaofang ZhangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Vani GuptaCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine in Long Island, NY, United States.
Li LiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qian ZhongDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CNNew York Institute of Technology · USWest China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare two different routes of postoperative estrogen treatment on the improvements of menstruation, postoperative endometrial thickness, and fertility outcomes in patients with moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions (IUA). Methods: This study prospectively included 78 women (age: 25 to 45 years) with moderate to severe IUA who underwent hysteroscopic resection of adhesions between March 2019 and October 2020. The enrolled patients were randomized 1:1 into either the transdermal gel group (n = 39) or the estradiol valerate oral tablet group (n = 39) on the day of receiving hysteroscopy. Postoperative endometrial thickness, AFS (American Fertility Society) score, estrogen level, and the pattern and amount of menstruation were compared. Pregnancy information was actively collected during 1-year follow-up after the operation. Results: The postoperative endometrium thickness was improved in both groups, and both groups gained menstruation improvement rates of 67%. For patients who underwent second-look hysteroscopy (17 from the oral group and 19 from the transdermal group), the mean AFS score declined greater than 2 in both groups. For patients with postoperative pregnancy intention, the pregnancy rates at 1-year follow-up after the procedures were 40.5% and 28% in the transdermal group and oral group, respectively. Although no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups, patients in the transdermal group had a tendency toward increased pregnancy rate. Conclusions: Transdermal administration of estrogen is equally efficacious as oral estrogen in postoperative treatment of IUA patients with a relatively safe profile. It is very likely to broaden its indication to the field of IUA. Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=37197, identifier ChiCTR1900022110.

Indexed as

HysteroscopyUterine DiseasesAdultEstradiolEstrogensFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy RateTissue AdhesionsEstradiolEstrogensestrogenhysteroscopyintrauterine adhesionmenstruationpregnancyrandomized controlled trialtransdermal

Identifiers

PMID36967790
PMCPMC10031037
OpenAlexW4323566919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read40
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.