Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36967743›Full record

ArticlePediatric investigation2023

Can non-typeable

Sophia Bowman-Derrick, Tegan M Harris, Jemima Beissbarth, Mariana Kleinecke, Katrina Lawrence, Teresa M Wozniak, Amy Bleakley, Angela Rumaseb, Michael J Binks, Robyn L Marsh and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric investigation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Can non-typeablePediatric investigation · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sophia Bowman-DerrickMenzies School of Health Research Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3270-7751
Tegan M HarrisMenzies School of Health Research Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia.
Jemima BeissbarthMenzies School of Health Research Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia.
Mariana KleineckeMenzies School of Health Research Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia.
Katrina LawrenceMenzies School of Health Research Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia.
Teresa M WozniakMenzies School of Health Research Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia.
Amy BleakleyMenzies School of Health Research Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia.
Angela RumasebMenzies School of Health Research Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia.
Michael J BinksMenzies School of Health Research Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia.
Robyn L MarshMenzies School of Health Research Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia.
Peter S MorrisMenzies School of Health Research Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia.
Amanda J LeachMenzies School of Health Research Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia.
Heidi Smith-VaughanMenzies School of Health Research Charles Darwin University Darwin Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3706-7052
Charles Darwin University · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In remote communities of the Northern Territory, Australia, children experience high rates of otitis media (OM), commonly caused by non-typeable Objective: To determine whether population-level nasopharyngeal NTHi antibiotic susceptibility data could inform antibiotic treatment for OM. Methods: NTHi isolates ( Results: Among 174 NTHi isolates available for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 10.3% (18/174) were resistant to ampicillin and 9.2% (16/174) were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Small numbers of isolates (≤3) were resistant to tetracycline, chloramphenicol, or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. There was no statistical difference in the proportion of ampicillin-resistant ( Interpretation: In this population-level study, nasopharyngeal and ear discharge isolates did not represent distinct microbial populations. These results support tracking of population-level nasopharyngeal NTHi antibiotic resistance patterns to inform clinical management of OM in this population.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceHaemophilus influenzaeOtitis media

Identifiers

PMID36967743
PMCPMC10030701
OpenAlexW4319602957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.