Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36967715›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2023

A hypothesis for robust polarization vision: an example from the Australian imperial blue butterfly, Jalmenus evagoras.

Richard A Rabideau Childers, Gary D Bernard, Heqing Huang, Cheng-Chia Tsai, Mary Caswell Stoddard, Benedict G Hogan, Joel S F Greenwood, Edward R Soucy, Mark Cornwall, Matthew Lek Min Lim and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Richard A Rabideau ChildersDepartment of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7137-3192
Gary D BernardDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7460-5123
Heqing HuangDepartment of Applied Physics & Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0088-7177
Cheng-Chia TsaiDepartment of Applied Physics & Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5662-6908
Mary Caswell StoddardDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8264-3170
Benedict G HoganDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6762-7738
Joel S F GreenwoodCenter for Brain Science, Harvard University, 52 Oxford St - room 331, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2426-8004
Edward R SoucyCenter for Brain Science, Harvard University, 52 Oxford St - room 331, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1187-5596
Mark CornwallDepartment of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2528-2561
Matthew Lek Min LimDepartment of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0888-3595
Marjorie A LiénardDepartment of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3193-3666
Nanfang YuDepartment of Applied Physics & Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9462-4724
Naomi E PierceDepartment of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3366-1625
Harvard University · USColumbia University · USBroad Institute · USPrinceton University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

National Science Foundation PHY-1411445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Australian lycaenid butterfly Jalmenus evagoras has iridescent wings that are sexually dimorphic, spectrally and in their degree of polarization, suggesting that these properties are likely to be important in mate recognition. We first describe the results of a field experiment showing that free-flying individuals of J. evagoras discriminate between visual stimuli that vary in polarization content in blue wavelengths but not in others. We then present detailed reflectance spectrophotometry measurements of the polarization content of male and female wings, showing that female wings exhibit blue-shifted reflectance, with a lower degree of polarization relative to male wings. Finally, we describe a novel method for measuring alignment of ommatidial arrays: by measuring variation of depolarized eyeshine intensity from patches of ommatidia as a function of eye rotation, we show that (a) individual rhabdoms contain mutually perpendicular microvilli; (b) many rhabdoms in the array have their microvilli misaligned with respect to neighboring rhabdoms by as much as 45 deg; and (c) the misaligned ommatidia are useful for robust polarization detection. By mapping the distribution of the ommatidial misalignments in eye patches of J. evagoras, we show that males and females exhibit differences in the extent to which ommatidia are aligned. Both the number of misaligned ommatidia suitable for robust polarization detection and the number of aligned ommatidia suitable for edge detection vary with respect to both sex and eye patch elevation. Thus, J. evagoras exhibits finely tuned ommatidial arrays suitable for perception of polarized signals, likely to match sex-specific life history differences in the utility of polarized signals.

Indexed as

ButterfliesAnimalsAustraliaFemaleHumansMalePhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebrateVision, OcularButterfly visionEdge detectionEyeshineLycaenidaePolarization detectionPolarization vision

Identifiers

PMID36967715
PMCPMC10120070
OpenAlexW4361009848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.