Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36967714›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2023

The Relationship Between SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Titers and Avidity in Plasma Collected From Convalescent Nonvaccinated and Vaccinated Blood Donors.

Visa Nurmi, Chanice Knight, Lise Estcourt, Jussi Hepojoki, Abigail A Lamikanra, Hoi P Tsang, David J Roberts, Fernando P Polack, Peter Simmonds, Klaus Hedman and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02735707 phase3recruitingnot on this map

Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial Adaptive Platform Trial for Community- Acquired Pneumonia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUMC UtrechtRan2016 to 2028Enrolled20,000ConditionsCommunity-acquired Pneumonia, Influenza, COVID-19ArmsCeftriaxone, Moxifloxacin or Levofloxacin, Piperacillin-tazobactam, Ceftaroline, Amoxicillin-clavulanate
NCT04479163 nacompletednot on this map

Prevention of Severe Covid-19 in Infected Elderly by Early Administration of Convalescent Plasma With High-titers of Antibody Against SARS-CoV2.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacion InfantRan2020 to 2020Enrolled165ConditionsCOVIDArmsConvalescent Plasma, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Visa NurmiNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Chanice KnightNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Lise EstcourtClinical Services, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jussi HepojokiDepartment of Virology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Abigail A LamikanraClinical Services, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Hoi P TsangClinical Services, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, United Kingdom.
David J RobertsClinical Services, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Fernando P PolackFundación Infant, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Peter SimmondsNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Klaus HedmanDepartment of Virology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1779-7960
Damian Alvarez-PaggiFundación Infant, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Heli HarvalaRadcliffe Department of Medicine and Biomedical Research Centre Haematology Theme, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convalescent plasma (CP) treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has shown significant therapeutic effect when administered early (eg, Argentinian trial showing reduced hospitalization) but has in general been ineffective (eg, REMAP-CAP trial without improvement during hospitalization). To investigate whether the differences in CP used could explain the different outcomes, we compared neutralizing antibodies, anti-spike IgG, and avidity of CP used in the REMAP-CAP and Argentinian trials and in convalescent vaccinees. We found no difference between the trial plasmas, emphasizing initial patient serostatus as treatment efficacy predictor. By contrast, vaccinee CP showed significantly higher titers and avidity, being preferable for future CP treatment. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02735707 and NCT04479163.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBlood DonorsCOVID-19 SerotherapyHumansImmunization, PassiveAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, Viralavidityconvalescent plasmaCOVID-19IgGneutralizing antibodySARS-CoV-2treatment

Identifiers

PMID36967714
PMCPMC10420400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.