Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36967701›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2023

An overlooked effect: domestic violence and alcohol policies in the night-time economy.

Michala Kowalski, Michael Livingston, Claire Wilkinson, Alison Ritter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michala KowalskiDrug Policy Modelling Program, Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3175-808X
Michael LivingstonNational Drug Research Institute and enAble Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8995-9386
Claire WilkinsonDrug Policy Modelling Program, Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4815-5840
Alison RitterDrug Policy Modelling Program, Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9540-1920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsRestrictive late-night alcohol policies are aimed at reducing alcohol-related violence but, to date, no evaluations of their impact on family and domestic violence have been conducted. This study aimed to measure whether modifying the drinking environment and restricting on-site trading hours affected reported rates of family and domestic violence. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsThis study used a non-equivalent control group design with two treatment sites and two matched control sites with pre- and postintervention data on rates of family and domestic violence assaults within local catchment areas of four late-night entertainment precincts in New South Wales, Australia, covering a population of 27 309 people. Participants comprised monthly counts of police-recorded incidents of domestic violence assaults from January 2001 to December 2019. INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATORS: Two variations of restrictive late-night interventions were used: restricted entry to late-night venues after 1:30 a.m., trading ceasing at 3:30 a.m. and other restrictions on alcohol service (Newcastle); and restricted entry to late-night venues after 1 a.m. and a range of restrictions on alcohol service (Hamilton). The comparators were no restrictions on late-night trading or modifications of the drinking environment (Wollongong and Maitland). MEASUREMENTS: Measurements involved the rate, type and timing of reported family and domestic violence assaults.

findingsReported rates of domestic violence assaults fell at both intervention sites, while reported domestic violence assaults increased over time in the control sites. The protective effects in Newcastle were robust and statistically significant across three main models. The relative reduction associated with the intervention in Newcastle was 29% (incidence rate ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.83) and an estimated 204 assaults were prevented across the duration of the study. The protective effects found in Hamilton were not consistently supported across the three main models.

conclusionsIncreases to late-night alcohol restrictions may reduce rates of domestic violence.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingDomestic ViolenceAustraliaCommerceHumansPublic PolicyAlcohol-related violenceAustraliaevaluationfamily violencelockout lawsviolence in the night-time economy

Identifiers

PMID36967701
PMCPMC10952798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.