Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36967448›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2023

Prospective, Observational, Multicenter, Real-World Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Pattern of Use of the Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Diabetic Macular Edema in France: Short-Term Outcomes of LOUVRE 3.

Laurent Kodjikian, Cécile Delcourt, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher, Pascale Massin, John Conrath, Marie-Ève Velard, Thibaut Lassalle, Sybil Pinchinat, Laure Dupont-Benjamin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03003416 (Efficacy of Ozurdex® in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03003416 completednot on this map

Efficacy of Ozurdex® in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)

TypeobservationalSponsorAllerganRan2017 to 2018Enrolled115ConditionsDiabetic Macular EdemaArmsdexamethasone intravitreal implant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Laurent KodjikianLa Croix-Rousse Hospital, University Hospital of Lyon, 103 Grande Rue de La Croix-Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France. kodjikian.laurent@wanadoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-6716
Cécile DelcourtUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2099-0481
Catherine Creuzot-GarcherCentre Hospitalier de L'Université de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Pascale MassinCentre Hospitalier de L'Université de Lariboisière, Paris, France.
John ConrathCentre Monticelli-Paradis, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9382-2526
Marie-Ève VelardAllergan, an AbbVie Company, Courbevoie, France.
Thibaut LassalleAxonal-Biostatem, Castries, France.
Sybil PinchinatAxonal-Biostatem, Castries, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5897-7346
Laure Dupont-BenjaminAllergan, an AbbVie Company, Courbevoie, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7748-0768
AbbVie (Ireland) · IECzech Academy of Sciences, Biology Centre · CZHôpital Fernand-Widal · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité de Bourgogne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo evaluate real-world efficacy, safety, and treatment patterns with the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) in diabetic macular edema (DME) in France.

methodsIn this prospective, multicenter, observational, noncomparative, post-reimbursement study, consecutively enrolled patients with DME had a baseline evaluation on day 0. Those treated with DEX on day 0 were to be reevaluated at week 6 and months 6, 12, 18, and 24. DEX retreatment and/or alternative therapies were allowed during follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the maximum best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gain from baseline during follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included time to maximum BCVA gain, patients (%) with prespecified BCVA gains from baseline at each visit, maximum central retinal thickness (CRT) reduction from baseline, patients (%) with CRT reduction ≥ 20% from baseline at each visit, patients (%) with DME resolution (per investigator judgement), and adverse events (AEs).

resultsOf 112 patients/eyes with DME for 3.5 years (mean) at baseline, 80 (including 86.1% previously treated) received DEX on day 0 and were analyzed for efficacy. Early study termination precluded collection of ≥ 12-month efficacy data. Patients received 1.4 DEX injections over 8.3 months (averages). The maximum BCVA gain from baseline was 3.6 letters, reached after 77.2 days (averages); 24.6% (week 6) and 15.0% (month 6) of patients experienced ≥ 10-letter BCVA gains from baseline. The mean maximum CRT reduction from baseline was -146.4 µm; 61.4% (week 6) and 36.0% (month 6) of patients had CRT reductions ≥ 20% from baseline, and 68.1% reported DME resolution at least once during follow-up. Ocular hypertension (n = 8, 12.1%) was the most frequent treatment-related AE.

conclusionsLOUVRE 3 confirmed that DEX improves BCVA and CRT, even in a patient population that had predominantly received DEX before enrollment in the study, and showed that DME resolution was observed during follow-up. DEX tolerability was consistent with published data, supporting treatment benefits in DME. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03003416.

Indexed as

DexamethasoneDiabetic macular edemaFranceImplantIntravitrealReal-world evidenceVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID36967448
PMCPMC10164204
OpenAlexW4360976599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.