Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36967420›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2023

Systematic rotation versus continuous application of 'nasal prongs' or 'nasal mask' in preterm infants on nCPAP: a randomized controlled trial.

Gaurav Gautam, Neeraj Gupta, Rohit Sasidharan, Sivam Thanigainathan, Bharti Yadav, Kuldeep Singh, Arun Singh

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. OcclusiveEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Comparison of nasal interfaces and pressures during critical time-points in NICU: observation data from over 10 years.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gaurav Gautam *Department of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, 342005, Rajasthan, India.
Neeraj Gupta *Department of Neonatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, 342005, Rajasthan, India. neerajpgi@yahoo.co.in.
Rohit SasidharanDepartment of Neonatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, 342005, Rajasthan, India.
Sivam ThanigainathanDepartment of Neonatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, 342005, Rajasthan, India.
Bharti YadavDepartment of Neonatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, 342005, Rajasthan, India.
Kuldeep SinghDepartment of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, 342005, Rajasthan, India.
Arun SinghDepartment of Neonatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, 342005, Rajasthan, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare whether alternate rotation of nasal mask with nasal prongs every 8 h as compared to continuous use of either interface alone decreases the incidence of nasal injury in preterm infants receiving nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP). This was an open-label, three-arm, stratified randomized controlled trial where infants < 35 weeks receiving nCPAP were randomized into three groups using two different nasal interfaces (continuous prongs group, continuous mask group, and rotation group). All infants were assessed for nasal injury six hours post-removal of nCPAP using grading suggested by Fischer et al. The nursing care was uniform across all three groups. Intention-to-treat analysis was done. Fifty-seven infants were enrolled, with nineteen in each group. The incidence of nasal injury was 42.1% vs. 47.4% vs. 68.4% in the rotation group, continuous mask, and continuous prongs groups, respectively (P = 0.228). On adjusted analysis (gestational age, birth weight, and duration of nCPAP therapy), the incidence of nasal injury was significantly less in the rotation group as compared to continuous prongs group (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR], 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.10 [0.01-0.69], P = 0.02) and a trend towards lesser nasal injury as compared to continuous mask group (AOR, 95% CI; 0.15 [0.02-1.08], P = 0.06). However, there was no significant difference in incidence of nasal injuries between continuous prongs versus continuous mask group (P = 0.60). The need for surfactant, nCPAP failure rate, duration of nCPAP, and common neonatal co-morbidities were similar across all three groups.   Conclusion: Systematic rotation of nasal mask with nasal prongs significantly reduced nasal injury among preterm infants on nCPAP as compared to continuous use of nasal prongs alone without affecting nCPAP failure rate.   Trial registration: CTRI/2019/01/017320, registered on 31/01/2019. What is Known: • Use of nasal mask as an interface for nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure decreases nasal injury as compared to nasal prongs. What is New: • Rotation of nasal prongs and nasal mask interfaces alternately every 8 h may reduce the nasal injury even further as compared to either interface alone.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornContinuous Positive Airway PressureGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornRotationCPAPNasal injuryNasal interfacesPreterm infantsRotation

Identifiers

PMID36967420
PMCPMC10040306
OpenAlexW4361011409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.