Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36967380›Full record

ArticleArchives of physiotherapy2023

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of three implementation measures into Brazilian-Portuguese.

Iuri Fioratti, Verônica S Santos, Lívia G Fernandes, Karina A Rodrigues, Renato J Soares, Bruno T Saragiotto

Registry-linked trialFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physiotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07170007 (Physiotherapeutic Protocol Compared to Usual Care in the Treatment of Postpartum Primiparas After Perineal Trauma), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07170007 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Physiotherapeutic Protocol Compared to Usual Care in the Treatment of Postpartum Primiparas After Perineal Trauma: A Type 1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Randomized Controlled Trial With Economic Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2025 to 2029Enrolled82ConditionsEpisiotomy, Lacerations Perineal, Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury, Perineal InjuryArmsPhysiotherapeutic protocol, Usual maternity care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iuri FiorattiMasters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7539-5981
Verônica S SantosMasters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1433-818X
Lívia G FernandesMasters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3417-8937
Karina A RodriguesDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade de Taubaté, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3413-9951
Renato J SoaresDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade de Taubaté, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7937-9935
Bruno T SaragiottoMasters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. bruno.saragiotto@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4409-8057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo translate and cross-culturally adapt into Brazilian-Portuguese, and to test the measurement properties of the following items of implementation outcome measures: Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM).

methodsThis was a measurement properties study in accordance with the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). We conducted a translation and cross-cultural adaptation of three implementation measures according to guidelines for translation and cross-cultural adaptation, then we collected information from patients who had participated in remotely delivered physical therapy treatment for musculoskeletal condition. The patients answered the translated versions of the implementation outcome measures. The measurement properties of the three implementation outcome measures were collected in a test-retest assessment, with an interval of 7 to 14 days.. The measurement properties evaluated in this study were interpretability, measured using Ceiling and Floor Effects, reliability in test-retest evaluation, measured using Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient, internal consistency, measured using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and construct validity, measured using Pearson Correlation.

resultsWe included 104 participants (76 female). The average age of the sample was 56.8 (SD 14.8) years old. The items of implementation outcome measures (AIM, IAM, and FIM) showed 66.39%, 63.11%, and 63.93% of ceiling effects. The items of implementation outcome measures showed adequate internal consistency measured using Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient (

aim0.89, IAM: 0.91, FIM: 0.93) and values of Standard Error of Measurement between 5 and 10%, showing good measurement error. The results of AIM and IAM was classified as moderate reliability and the FIM as substantial reliability. In a total 96 correlations, > 75% of correlations met our prior hypothesis.

conclusionThe three Brazilian-Portuguese versions of items of implementation outcome measures had adequate internal consistency, measurement error and construct validity. The three implementation outcome measures showed moderate to substantial reliability values. The Ceiling Effect was observed in the three measures, showing maximum values ​​in more than 15% of the evaluations.

Indexed as

AcceptabilityFeasibilityImplementation ScienceMeasurements

Identifiers

PMID36967380
PMCPMC10041794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read24
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.