Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36967375›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Impact of corticosteroids on the duration of ventilatory support during severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients in the intensive care unit: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

Alexis Ferré, Arnaud W Thille, Armand Mekontso-Dessap, Thomas Similowski, Stéphane Legriel, Philippe Aegerter, Alexandre Demoule, Réseau Européen de Recherche en Ventilation Artificielle (REVA) research network

Open access · goldFull text readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alexis FerréIntensive Care Unit, Versailles Hospital, Le Chesnay, France. aferre@ght78sud.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5752-8274
Arnaud W ThilleService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Armand Mekontso-DessapService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, APHP. Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
Thomas SimilowskiDépartement R3S, APHP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Stéphane LegrielIntensive Care Unit, Versailles Hospital, Le Chesnay, France.
Philippe AegerterGroupement Inter-Régional de Recherche Clinique Et d'Innovation (GIRCI) - Île-de-France, Cellule méthodologique - Santé Publique UVSQ-Inserm U1168, Paris, France.
Alexandre DemouleService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, APHP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié- Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Réseau Européen de Recherche en Ventilation Artificielle (REVA) research network
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier de Versailles · FRHôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

PHRC-N, French Ministry of Health PHRC-18-0127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients who are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have poor outcomes. Although international clinical practice guidelines cautiously recommend the routine use of systemic corticosteroids for COPD exacerbations, data are scarce and inconclusive regarding their benefit for most severe patients who require mechanical ventilation in the ICU. Furthermore, corticosteroids may be associated with an increased risk of infection, ICU-acquired limb weakness, and metabolic disorders. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial comparing systemic corticosteroids to placebo during severe acute exacerbations of COPD in patients who require mechanical ventilation in French ICUs. A total of 440 patients will be randomized 1:1 to methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg) or placebo for 5 days, and stratified according to initial mechanical ventilation (non-invasive or invasive), pneumonia as triggering factor, and recent use of systemic corticosteroids (< 48 h). The primary outcome is the number of ventilator-free days at day 28, defined as the number of days alive and without mechanical invasive and/or non-invasive ventilation between randomization and day 28. Secondary outcomes include non-invasive ventilation (NIV) failure rate, duration of mechanical ventilation (invasive and/or NIV), circulatory support (vasopressor), outcomes related to corticosteroid adverse events (severe hyperglycaemia, gastrointestinal bleeding, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, ICU-acquired weakness, ICU-acquired infections, and delirium), lengths of ICU and hospital stay, ICU and hospital mortality, day 28 and day 90 mortality, number of new exacerbation(s)/hospitalization(s) between hospital discharge and day 90, and dyspnoea and comfort at randomization, ICU discharge, and day 90. Subgroup analyses for the primary outcome are planned according to stratification criteria at randomization.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdrenal Cortex HormonesHumansIntensive Care UnitsMethylprednisoloneMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiration, ArtificialAdrenal Cortex HormonesMethylprednisoloneCOPDCorticosteroidsExacerbationMechanical ventilationMortality

Identifiers

PMID36967375
PMCPMC10040256
OpenAlexW4360979096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read33
identifiers read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.