ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2023
Mapping cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks using CRISPR technologies.
Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR-Cas-based live cell imaging of genome dynamics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- DNA-PKcs inhibitor AZD7648 reveals sgRNA cross-contaminants and enhanced sensitivity of genome engineering off-target activity in HSPCs.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Review
- MUSICiAn: genome-wide identification of genes involved in DNA repair via control-free mutational spectra analysis.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- O-GlcNAcylation of NONO mediates alternative splicing of SETMAR and facilitates NHEJ repair.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Imaging the time course of DNA damage response at a nonrepetitive endogenous locus.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Unveiling the cut-and-repair cycle of designer nucleases in human stem and T cells via CLEAR-time dPCR.Nature communications · 2025Article
- RESTRICT-seq enables time-gated CRISPR screens and uncovers novel epigenetic dependencies of SCC resistance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Topoisomerase Inhibitors and PIM1 Kinase Inhibitors Improve Gene Editing Efficiency Mediated by CRISPR-Cas9 and Homology-Directed Repair.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing: a novel strategy for fighting drug resistance in respiratory disorders.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most genotoxic DNA lesions, driving a range of pathological defects from cancers to immunodeficiencies. To combat genomic instability caused by DSBs, evolution has outfitted cells with an intricate protein network dedicated to the rapid and accurate repair of these lesions. Pioneering studies have identified and characterized many crucial repair factors in this network, while the advent of genome manipulation tools like clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) has reinvigorated interest in DSB repair mechanisms. This review surveys the latest methodological advances and biological insights gained by utilizing Cas9 as a precise 'damage inducer' for the study of DSB repair. We highlight rapidly inducible Cas9 systems that enable synchronized and efficient break induction. When combined with sequencing and genome-specific imaging approaches, inducible Cas9 systems greatly expand our capability to spatiotemporally characterize cellular responses to DSB at specific genomic coordinates, providing mechanistic insights that were previously unobtainable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.