Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36966496›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in oncology2023

Hybrid magnetic resonance and PET imaging for prostate cancer recurrence.

Nikita Rednam, Vikas Kundra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikita RednamDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Vikas Kundra
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND GREENEBAUM CANCER CENTERSUPPORT GRANTP30CA134274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Vu H. Duong · 2008 to 2026
$51.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA134274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRecurrence post definitive local therapy by prostatectomy or radiation therapy is often detected via rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels; however, PSA rise does not localize the disease. Distinguishing local versus distant recurrence guides whether to choose subsequent local versus systemic therapy. The purpose of this article is to review imaging for prostate cancer recurrence post local therapy. RECENT

findingsAmong imaging modalities, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is commonly used to assess for local recurrence. New radiopharmaceuticals target prostate cancer cells and enable whole-body imaging. These tend to be more sensitive for lymph node metastases than MRI or computed tomography (CT) and for bone lesions than bone scan at lower PSA levels but can be limited for local prostate cancer recurrence. Given greater soft tissue contrast, similar criteria for lymph nodes, and greater sensitivity for prostate bone metastases, MRI is advantageous to CT. MRI of the whole body and mpMRI are now feasible within a reasonable time frame and complementary to PET imaging, enabling whole-body and pelvis-focused PET-MRI, which should be advantageous in the setting of recurrent prostate cancer. SUMMARY: Hybrid PET-MRI with prostate cancer targeted radiopharmaceuticals and whole body with local multiparametric MRI can be complementary for detecting local and distant recurrence to guide treatment planning.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPelvisPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstateProstatectomyRadiopharmaceuticalsProstate-Specific AntigenRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID36966496
PMCPMC13625937
OpenAlexW4360977292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.