Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36966478›Full record

ReviewExperimental physiology2024

Biophysical model of muscle spindle encoding.

Stephen N Housley, Randal K Powers, Paul Nardelli, Sebinne Lee, Kyle Blum, Guy S Bewick, Robert W Banks, Timothy C Cope

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Biophysical model of muscle spindle encoding.Experimental physiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen N HousleySchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-7046-9109
Randal K PowersDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Paul NardelliSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
Sebinne LeeSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-7098-9067
Kyle BlumDepartment of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Guy S BewickInstitute of Medical Science, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8266-7797
Robert W BanksDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1614-6488
Timothy C CopeSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0001-8835-8055
Georgia Institute of Technology · USDurham University · GBNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Multiscale models of proprioceptive encoding to reveal mechanisms of impaired sensorimotor controlR01HD090642 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COPE, TIMOTHY C, SAWICKI, GREGORY STEPHEN · 2016 to 2025
$4.9M
Novel Path to Chronic Sensorimotor Dysfunction and Treatment for ChemotherapyR01CA221363 · NCI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI COPE, TIMOTHY C · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA221363NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD090642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle spindles encode mechanosensory information by mechanisms that remain only partially understood. Their complexity is expressed in mounting evidence of various molecular mechanisms that play essential roles in muscle mechanics, mechanotransduction and intrinsic modulation of muscle spindle firing behaviour. Biophysical modelling provides a tractable approach to achieve more comprehensive mechanistic understanding of such complex systems that would be difficult/impossible by more traditional, reductionist means. Our objective here was to construct the first integrative biophysical model of muscle spindle firing. We leveraged current knowledge of muscle spindle neuroanatomy and in vivo electrophysiology to develop and validate a biophysical model that reproduces key in vivo muscle spindle encoding characteristics. Crucially, to our knowledge, this is the first computational model of mammalian muscle spindle that integrates the asymmetric distribution of known voltage-gated ion channels (VGCs) with neuronal architecture to generate realistic firing profiles, both of which seem likely to be of great biophysical importance. Results predict that particular features of neuronal architecture regulate specific characteristics of Ia encoding. Computational simulations also predict that the asymmetric distribution and ratios of VGCs is a complementary and, in some instances, orthogonal means to regulate Ia encoding. These results generate testable hypotheses and highlight the integral role of peripheral neuronal structure and ion channel composition and distribution in somatosensory signalling.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularMuscle SpindlesAnimalsElectrophysiological PhenomenaIon ChannelsMammalsNeuronsIon Channelsbiophysical modellingmuscle spindle firingsensory encodingvoltage-gated ion channels

Identifiers

PMID36966478
PMCPMC10988694
OpenAlexW4360976507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.