ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2023
Patient and public involvement in research: the need for budgeting PPI staff costs in funding applications.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reflections on the role of Peer Researchers in eating disorders: identifying challenges, best practices, and future directions.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Challenges and possibilities of public and patient involvement for early-career researchers: pedagogy, practice and data governance.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Engagement in Cancer Epidemiology Cohorts.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Article
- Perception of physiotherapy researchers about patient and public involvement in health research design and planning in Nigeria.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- "Truly having a conversation with each member about their needs": accessibility considerations for the engagement of people with lived and living experience and caregivers in mental health and substance use health research.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- The PRO-CAR-T™ study: achieving excellence in patient and public involvement and engagement.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Amplifying the voices of people with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) care through photovoice: a case study of patient and public involvement in Klang, Malaysia.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Service user involvement in the education of allied healthcare professionals in Ireland: a mixed-methods exploration.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- 'Making little ethical decisions all the time': examining an ethical framework for consumer and community involvement in research, a co-produced ethnographic study.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Patient and public involvement and engagement in methodology research: process, experiences, and recommendations from the SPIRIT- and CONSORT-Surrogate project.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- A novel framework for operationalising patient and public involvement: lessons from designing an AI-informed exercise prescription grant.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- 'Plugging the gap': development of a plain language glossary for statistical methodology research.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Involving consumers in health research through the use of consumer panels: a scoping review.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Review
- A co-designed feasibility study to understand the impact of an emergency homelessness housing intervention in Ireland.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Ganz Salzburg bewegen [All of Salzburg Moving]: a large-scale public involvement project with underserved groups, for the co-design of local and contextualized physical activity promotion concepts.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Co-Production and Implementation of 'Count Me In': A Bottom-Up Approach to Inclusive Research and Participation in a National Health Service in England.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Patient and public involvement in dementia and neuroprogressive conditions: commentary from NHS Scotland based 'partners in research'.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- The Importance of Lived Experience: A Scoping Review on the Value of Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Attitudes and perceptions regarding knowledge translation and community engagement in medical research: the PERSPECT qualitative study.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Involving People With Lived Experience in Electronic Health Record Database Studies Reflections and Learning From the CHOOSE Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient and Public Involvement (PPI) groups are becoming more established as collaborators with academic researchers and institutions to ensure that research is important and relevant to end users, and to identify areas that might have ethical considerations, as well as to advise on solutions. The National Institute for Health and Care Research UK Standards for Public Involvement in Research embody best practice for PPI, including support and learning opportunities that build confidence and skills for members of the public to play an invaluable and mutually productive role in research. However, the pivotal role of research and professional services (management and administrative) staff within academic institutions for sustaining and making this involvement successful is often overlooked. MAIN BODY: It takes significant effort to develop and sustain effective PPI in research. The six UK Standards for Public Involvement highlight the need for consistent, inclusive, well-governed and mutually respectful working relationships to sustain effective PPI contributions in health research. Productivity across a team of lay and academic members requires organisation and experience of implementing these standards by a dedicated PPI team, yet advice on PPI finances is usually focused on costs for patient panel members, and budgets in funding applications rarely consider the wider PPI team behind this involvement. As an exemplar, we reflect on how the Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research (AUKCAR) has developed a dedicated PPI Platform, with guidance for how PPI should be embedded throughout the research lifecycle, and detailed information to support the costing of PPI in funding applications. AUKCAR's work with established researchers, as well as Early Career Researchers and PhD students, is at the heart of a campaign to raise awareness of the importance of PPI in effective research planning.
conclusionFocusing attention on the staff behind best practice involvement in health research may stimulate a much-needed discussion to ensure flourishing PPI capacity, with significant patient and public benefit. With adaptation, the PPI expertise within AUKCAR can be translated more widely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.