Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36966233›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2023

Pathological regression of primary tumour and metastatic lymph nodes following chemotherapy in resectable OG cancer: pooled analysis of two trials.

Avani Athauda, Matthew Nankivell, Rupert Langer, Susan Pritchard, Ruth E Langley, Katharina von Loga, Naureen Starling, Ian Chau, David Cunningham, Heike I Grabsch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel delivery on postoperative survival in locally advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Avani AthaudaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Lymphoma, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Matthew NankivellMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Rupert LangerKlinisches Institut fur Pathologie und Molekularpathologie, Kepler Universitatsklinikum, Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9491-3609
Susan PritchardDepartment of Pathology, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Ruth E LangleyMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Katharina von LogaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Lymphoma, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Naureen StarlingDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Lymphoma, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ian ChauDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Lymphoma, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0286-8703
David CunninghamDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Lymphoma, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. David.cunningham@rmh.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5158-1069
Heike I GrabschDepartment of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. h.grabsch@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9520-6228
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBKepler Universitätsklinikum · ATManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo definitive largescale data exist evaluating the role of pathologically defined regression changes within the primary tumour and lymph nodes (LN) of resected oesophagogastric (OG) adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the impact on survival.

methodsData and samples from two large prospective randomised trials (UK MRC OE05 and ST03) were pooled. Stained slides were available for central pathology review from 1619 patients. Mandard tumour regression grade (TRG) and regression of tumour within LNs (LNR: scored as present/absent) were assessed and correlated with overall survival (OS) using a Cox regression model. An exploratory analysis to define subgroups with distinct prognoses was conducted using a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.

resultsNeither trial demonstrated a relationship between TRG score and the presence or absence of LNR. In univariable analysis, lower TRG, lower ypN stage, lower ypT stage, presence of LNR, presence of well/moderate tumour differentiation, and absence of tumour at resection margin were all associated with better OS. However, the multivariable analysis demonstrated that only ypN, ypT, grade of differentiation and resection margin (R0) were independent indicators of prognosis. Exploratory CART analysis identified six subgroups with 3-year OS ranging from 83% to 22%; with ypN stage being the most important single prognostic variable.

conclusionsPathological LN stage within the resection specimen was the single most important determiner of survival. Our results suggest that the assessment of regression changes within the primary tumour or LNs may not be necessary to define the prognosis further.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaMargins of ExcisionHumansLymph NodesNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProspective StudiesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36966233
PMCPMC10206103
OpenAlexW4360951922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.