Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36966218›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Contour device implantation versus coil embolization for treatment of narrow neck intracranial aneurysms.

Karim Mostafa, Fernando Bueno Neves, Friederike Gärtner, Sönke Peters, Johannes Hensler, Naomi Larsen, Tristan Klintz, Justus Mahnke, Olav Jansen, Fritz Wodarg

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karim Mostafa *Department for Radiology and Neuroradiology, Universityhospital Schleswig Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Street 3, Building D, 24105, Kiel, Germany. karim.mostafa@uksh.de.
Fernando Bueno Neves *Department for Radiology and Neuroradiology, Universityhospital Schleswig Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Street 3, Building D, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Friederike GärtnerDepartment for Radiology and Neuroradiology, Universityhospital Schleswig Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Street 3, Building D, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Sönke PetersDepartment for Radiology and Neuroradiology, Universityhospital Schleswig Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Street 3, Building D, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Johannes HenslerDepartment for Radiology and Neuroradiology, Universityhospital Schleswig Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Street 3, Building D, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Naomi LarsenDepartment for Radiology and Neuroradiology, Universityhospital Schleswig Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Street 3, Building D, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Tristan KlintzDepartment for Radiology and Neuroradiology, Universityhospital Schleswig Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Street 3, Building D, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Justus MahnkeDepartment for Radiology and Neuroradiology, Universityhospital Schleswig Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Street 3, Building D, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Olav JansenDepartment for Radiology and Neuroradiology, Universityhospital Schleswig Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Street 3, Building D, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Fritz WodargDepartment for Radiology and Neuroradiology, Universityhospital Schleswig Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Street 3, Building D, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel Contour device is an intrasaccular flow disruption device designed for treatment of intracranial wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. Outside its original purpose, Contour implantation can be used to treat aneurysms with a higher dome-to-neck ratio which would be suitable for conventional unassisted coil embolization. We compared both techniques in a retrospective single-center analysis. A total of 42 aneurysms from 42 patients with a dome-to-neck ratio of 1.6 or higher were included in this study. Data on technical success, implantation times, radiation dosages, procedural complications, reinterventions and recurrences were gathered and compared. Technical success was achieved in all cases with both techniques. Aneurysm embolization was achieved significantly faster in the Contour group compared to coiling (Overall p = 0.0002; r = 0.580; acute setting: p = 0.005, r = 0.531; elective setting: p = 0.002, r = 0.607). Significantly less radiation dosage was applied in the Contour group (Overall p = 0.002; r = 0.478; acute group p = 0.006; r = 0.552; elective group p = 0.045; r = 0.397). The number of complications was higher in the coiling group compared to the Contour group (Coiling 7/21 (33,3%); Contour 3/21 (14.3%). There was a higher rate of reinterventions in the coiling group (7.6% vs 21.4%). Outside its original intention, the Contour device seems to be a safe and fast alternative to coil embolization for the treatment of narrow-neck-aneurysms.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmMusculoskeletal AbnormalitiesBlood Vessel ProsthesisCerebral AngiographyHumansRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36966218
PMCPMC10039918
OpenAlexW4360948897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read40
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.