ArticleScientific reports2023
Increasing the melting temperature of VHH with the in silico free energy score.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterising nanobody developability to improve therapeutic design using the Therapeutic Nanobody Profiler.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Development of a nanobody-based immunoassay for the analysis of the disinfectant triclosan in water.Talanta · 2025Article
- TEMPRO: nanobody melting temperature estimation model using protein embeddings.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
VHH, the antigen-binding fragment of a heavy chain-only antibody, is a useful component of antibody-based therapeutics. Thermal stability, represented by the melting temperature (Tm), is one of the key factors affecting the developability of antibody-based therapeutics. In this study, we examined whether the in silico free energy score dStability can be used to design mutants with improved Tm compared to the anti-lysozyme VHH, D3-L11. After verifying that exhaustive mutagenesis was inefficient for improving Tm, we performed a two-round rational approach that combined dStability calculations with a small number of experiments. This method improved the Tm by more than 5 °C in several single mutants including A79I. It reduced the affinity for the antigen by less than 1.6-fold. We speculate that stabilization of A79I required exquisite compatibility among neighboring residues to fill in the internal cavity in the protein. Given that we identified only one mutation that could simultaneously improve Tm and almost maintain affinity, we concluded that achieving both is extremely difficult, even with single mutations that are not located in the paratope. Therefore, we recommend using a variety of approaches when trying to achieve such a feat. Our method will be a useful complementary approach to other existing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.