Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36965820›Full record

ReviewMutation research. Reviews in mutation research

Predicting mutational function using machine learning.

Anthony Shea, Josh Bartz, Lei Zhang, Xiao Dong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anthony SheaInstitute on the Biology of Aging and Metabolism, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Josh BartzInstitute on the Biology of Aging and Metabolism, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Lei ZhangInstitute on the Biology of Aging and Metabolism, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Xiao DongInstitute on the Biology of Aging and Metabolism, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic address: dong0265@umn.edu.

Funding

Midwest Murine-Tissue Mapping Center (MM-TMC)U54AG079754 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GR Scott Budinger, Sundeep Khosla · 2022 to 2026
$11.5M
Minnesota Tissue Mapping Center for Senescent CellsU54AG076041 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Constantin F. Aliferis, LAURA Jane NIEDERNHOFER · 2021 to 2026
$10.5M
Computational evaluation of the causal role of somatic mutations in human agingR00AG056656 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DONG, XIAO · 2021 to 2023
$747k
NIA NIH HHS R00 AG056656NIA NIH HHS U54 AG076041NIA NIH HHS U54 AG079754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variations are one of the major causes of phenotypic variations between human individuals. Although beneficial as being the substrate of evolution, germline mutations may cause diseases, including Mendelian diseases and complex diseases such as diabetes and heart diseases. Mutations occurring in somatic cells are a main cause of cancer and likely cause age-related phenotypes and other age-related diseases. Because of the high abundance of genetic variations in the human genome, i.e., millions of germline variations per human subject and thousands of additional somatic mutations per cell, it is technically challenging to experimentally verify the function of every possible mutation and their interactions. Significant progress has been made to solve this problem using computational approaches, especially machine learning (ML). Here, we review the progress and achievements made in recent years in this field of research. We classify the computational models in two ways: one according to their prediction goals including protein structural alterations, gene expression changes, and disease risks, and the other according to their methodologies, including non-machine learning methods, classical machine learning methods, and deep neural network methods. For models in each category, we discuss their architecture, prediction accuracy, and potential limitations. This review provides new insights into the applications and future directions of computational approaches in understanding the role of mutations in aging and disease.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeoplasmsGerm-Line MutationHumansMutationProteinsProteinsDisease RiskGene ExpressionMachine LearningMutationProtein Structure

Identifiers

PMID36965820
PMCPMC10239318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.