ReviewMutation research. Reviews in mutation research
Predicting mutational function using machine learning.
Review in Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SomaMutDB 2.0: A comprehensive database for exploring somatic mutations and their functional impact in normal human tissues.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- CaRinDB: an integrated database of common cancer mutations and residue interaction network parameters.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Prediction of cancer driver genes and mutations: the potential of integrative computational frameworks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic variations are one of the major causes of phenotypic variations between human individuals. Although beneficial as being the substrate of evolution, germline mutations may cause diseases, including Mendelian diseases and complex diseases such as diabetes and heart diseases. Mutations occurring in somatic cells are a main cause of cancer and likely cause age-related phenotypes and other age-related diseases. Because of the high abundance of genetic variations in the human genome, i.e., millions of germline variations per human subject and thousands of additional somatic mutations per cell, it is technically challenging to experimentally verify the function of every possible mutation and their interactions. Significant progress has been made to solve this problem using computational approaches, especially machine learning (ML). Here, we review the progress and achievements made in recent years in this field of research. We classify the computational models in two ways: one according to their prediction goals including protein structural alterations, gene expression changes, and disease risks, and the other according to their methodologies, including non-machine learning methods, classical machine learning methods, and deep neural network methods. For models in each category, we discuss their architecture, prediction accuracy, and potential limitations. This review provides new insights into the applications and future directions of computational approaches in understanding the role of mutations in aging and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.