ReviewSeminars in immunology2023
Viral- and tumor-reactive natural killer cells.
Review in Seminars in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antitumor and immunomodulatory activities of diphyllin and its derivatives.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Adaptive and Innate Cytotoxic Effectors in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL) Subjects with Stable Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Cancer-associated mesenchymal stem/stromal cells: role in progression and potential targets for therapeutic approaches.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When we can understand what natural killer (NK) cells recognize during an encounter with an infectious pathogen or a tumor cell, and when we can understand how the NK cell responds to that encounter, we can then begin to understand the role of NK cells in human health and how to improve upon their role for the prevention and treatment of human disease. In the quest to understand how these cells function in antiviral and antitumoral immunity, there have been previously described mechanisms established for NK cells to participate in clearing viral infections and tumors, including classical NK cell antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) as well as recognition and elimination of transformed malignant cells through direct ligand interactions. However, it is now clear that there are additional mechanisms by which NK cells can participate in these critical immune tasks. Here we review two recently described types of NK cell recognition and response: the first is to primary infection with herpes virus, recognized and responded to by non-specific Fc bridged cellular cytotoxicity (FcBCC), and the second describes a novel phenotypic and functional response when a subset of NK cells recognize myeloid leukemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.