Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36965194›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2023

Superficial-layer versus deep-layer lateral entorhinal cortex: Coding of allocentric space, egocentric space, speed, boundaries, and corners.

Cheng Wang, Heekyung Lee, Geeta Rao, Yoganarasimha Doreswamy, Francesco Savelli, James J Knierim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impaired spatial coding of the hippocampus in a dentate gyrus hypoplasia mouse model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cheng WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Connectome and Behavior, CAS Key Laboratory of Brain Connectome and Manipulation, the Brain Cognition and Brain Disease Institute (BCBDI), Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2917-877X
Heekyung LeeZanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Geeta RaoZanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Yoganarasimha DoreswamyDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7122-6953
Francesco SavelliZanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
James J KnierimZanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1796-2930

Funding

MULTI-SITE ANALYSIS OF HIPPOCAMPAL NEURONAL ENSEMBLESR01NS039456 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI JAMES J KNIERIM · 2000 to 2026
$9.1M
Neural representations of external stimuli in the lateral entorhinal cortexR01MH094146 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KNIERIM, JAMES J · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094146NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Entorhinal cortex is the major gateway between the neocortex and the hippocampus and thus plays an essential role in subserving episodic memory and spatial navigation. It can be divided into the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) and the lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC), which are commonly theorized to be critical for spatial (context) and non-spatial (content) inputs, respectively. Consistent with this theory, LEC neurons are found to carry little information about allocentric self-location, even in cue-rich environments, but they exhibit egocentric spatial information about external items in the environment. The superficial and deep layers of LEC are believed to mediate the input to and output from the hippocampus, respectively. As earlier studies mainly examined the spatial firing properties of superficial-layer LEC neurons, here we characterized the deep-layer LEC neurons and made direct comparisons with their superficial counterparts in single unit recordings from behaving rats. Because deep-layer LEC cells received inputs from hippocampal regions, which have strong selectivity for self-location, we hypothesized that deep-layer LEC neurons would be more informative about allocentric position than superficial-layer LEC neurons. We found that deep-layer LEC cells showed only slightly more allocentric spatial information and higher spatial consistency than superficial-layer LEC cells. Egocentric coding properties were comparable between these two subregions. In addition, LEC neurons demonstrated preferential firing at lower speeds, as well as at the boundary or corners of the environment. These results suggest that allocentric spatial outputs from the hippocampus are transformed in deep-layer LEC into the egocentric coding dimensions of LEC, rather than maintaining the allocentric spatial tuning of the CA1 place fields.

Indexed as

Entorhinal CortexNeocortexAnimalsCA1 Region, HippocampalHippocampusNeuronsRatsentorhinal cortexhippocampusmedial temporal lobeparahippocampal

Identifiers

PMID36965194
PMCPMC11717144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.