Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964891›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2023

Effect of acoustic noise reduction technology on image quality: a multivendor study.

Takanobu Yamashiro, Yasuo Takatsu, Kosuke Morita, Masafumi Nakamura, Yoshihiro Yukimura, Kazuhiro Nakajima

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Takanobu YamashiroDepartment of Radiology, Minoh City Hospital, 5-7-1 Kayano, Mino-shi, Osaka, 562-8562, Japan. t.yamashiro.minoh.hp@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5031-8728
Yasuo TakatsuSchool of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, Molecular Imaging, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4384-089X
Kosuke MoritaDepartment of Central Radiology, Kumamoto University Hospital, 1-1-1 Honjo, , Kumamoto-shi, Kumamoto, 860-0811, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0163-5564
Masafumi NakamuraDivision of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa, 920-0942, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2520-8628
Yoshihiro YukimuraDepartment of Radiology, Ikeda City Hospital, 3-1-18 Jyonan, Ikeda-shi, Osaka, 563-8510, Japan.
Kazuhiro NakajimaDepartment of Radiology, Minoh City Hospital, 5-7-1 Kayano, Mino-shi, Osaka, 562-8562, Japan.
Kanazawa University · JPMinoh City Hospital · JPIkeda Municipal Hospital · JPKumamoto University Hospital · JP

Funding

Policy-Based Medical Services Foundation FY2021Policy-Based Medical Services Foundation grant number 6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to clarify the appropriate use of a combination of pulse sequences and acoustic noise reduction technology in general-purpose brain magnetic resonance imaging. Five pulse sequences commonly used in brain magnetic resonance imaging examinations-turbo spin-echo T2-weighted imaging, T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, diffusion-weighted imaging, and magnetic resonance angiography-were performed on healthy participants at three vendors where acoustic noise reduction technology was available. The results showed that acoustic noise reduction technology reduced sound pressure levels and altered image quality in all pulse sequences across all vendors' magnetic resonance imaging scanners. Although T2-weighted imaging and T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery resulted in little image quality degradation, T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, diffusion-weighted imaging, and magnetic resonance angiography had significant image degradation. Therefore, acoustic noise reduction technology should be used with caution.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance ImagingAcousticsBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyAcoustic noiseGradient waveformHearing protectionMagnetic resonance imagingNoise reduction

Identifiers

PMID36964891
OpenAlexW4360942109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.