Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964866›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2023

Multi-domain lifestyle intervention in older adults after myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the PIpELINe randomized clinical trial.

Elisabetta Tonet, Andrea Raisi, Silvia Zagnoni, Giorgio Chiaranda, Rita Pavasini, Francesco Vitali, Federico Gibiino, Roberta Campana, Alberto Boccadoro, Antonella Scala and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridFull text readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04183465 (Effectiveness of an Early, Tailored, Physical Activity Intervention in ELderly Patients With Myocardial INfarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04183465 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Effectiveness of an Early, Tailored, Physical Activity Intervention in ELderly Patients With Myocardial INfarction: the PIpELINe Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital of FerraraRan2020 to 2026Enrolled512ConditionsMyocardial Infarction, AgingArmsHealth Education, Multi-domain lifestyle intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Mediterranean diet and osteoarthritis: an update.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2024
    Review
  4. Elderly patients with ACS should not be denied invasive coronary angiography: pros and cons.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Elisabetta TonetCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.
Andrea RaisiCenter for Sports and Exercise Science, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Silvia ZagnoniCardiology Unit, Ospedale Maggiore, Azienda USL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giorgio ChiarandaSports Medicine and Health Promotion Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria locale di Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy.
Rita PavasiniCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.
Francesco VitaliCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.
Federico GibiinoCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.
Roberta CampanaCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.
Alberto BoccadoroCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.
Antonella ScalaCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.
Luca CanoviCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.
Veronica AmanteaCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.
Camilla MateseCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.
Maria Letizia BerloniCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy.
Tommaso PivaCenter for Sports and Exercise Science, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Valentina ZerbiniCenter for Sports and Exercise Science, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Laura Sofia CardelliCardiology Unit, Ospedale Maggiore, Azienda USL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanni PasanisiRehabilitation Cardiology, Azienda USL di Ferrara, Lagosanto, FE, Italy.
Gianni MazzoniCenter for Sports and Exercise Science, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Gianni CasellaCardiology Unit, Ospedale Maggiore, Azienda USL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanni GrazziCenter for Sports and Exercise Science, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Gianluca CampoCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, FE, Italy. cmpglc@unife.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5150-188X
Arcispedale Sant'Anna · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Ferrara · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Piacenza · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute GR 2018-12367114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is effective in improving physical performance and prognosis after myocardial infarction (MI). Anyway, it is not consistently recommended to older adults, and its attendance rate is low. Previous studies suggested that alternative, early and tailored exercise interventions are feasible and effective in improving physical performance in older MI patients. Anyway, the demonstration that they are associated also with a significant reduction of hard endpoints is lacking.

aimTo describe rationale and design of the "Physical activity Intervention in Elderly patients with myocardial Infarction" (PIpELINe) trial.

methodsThe PIpELINe trial is a prospective, randomized, multicentre study with a blinded adjudicated evaluation of the outcomes. Patients aged ≥ 65 years, admitted to hospital for MI and with a low physical performance one month after discharge, as defined as short physical performance battery (SPPB) value between 4 and 9, will be randomized to a multi-domain lifestyle intervention (including dietary counselling, strict management of cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors, and exercise training) or health education. The primary endpoint is the one-year occurrence of the composite of cardiovascular death or re-hospitalization for cardiovascular causes.

resultsThe recruitment started in March 2020. The estimated sample size is 456 patients. The conclusion of the enrolment is planned for mid-2023. The primary endpoint analysis will be available for the end of 2024.

conclusionsThe PIpELINe trial will show if a multi-domain lifestyle intervention is able to reduce adverse events in older patients with reduced physical performance after hospitalization for MI.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04183465.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationMyocardial InfarctionAgedExerciseHumansLife StyleMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicExercise interventionLifestyle interventionMyocardial infarctionOlder patients

Identifiers

PMID36964866
PMCPMC10039445
OpenAlexW4360939405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read19
identifiers read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.