Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964843›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2023

Parental Attitudes and Ideas Regarding Newborn Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Katie Tobik, Kate Murphy Orland, Xiao Zhang, Kristina Garcia, Amy L Peterson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katie TobikDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Genetics and Metabolism, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Kate Murphy OrlandDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Xiao ZhangDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, CSC H6/516B MC 4108, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Kristina GarciaGenetic Counseling Services, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.
Amy L PetersonDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, CSC H6/516B MC 4108, Madison, WI, 53792, USA. apeterson@pediatrics.wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-3002
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUW Health University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamilial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disease which causes premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, less than 10% of individuals with FH have been identified.

objectiveTo assess parental perspectives for inclusion of FH on routine newborn screening (NBS) and to highlight potential benefits, harms, and ethical concerns.

methodsTelephone interviews of two groups were conducted: 1) parents of children diagnosed with FH, and 2) parents of children diagnosed with a genetic condition through NBS. Stratified purposive sampling was used to ensure adequate representation. The 11 telephone interviews were conducted in 30-min sessions guided by a semi-structured interview script. At the beginning of the interview, participants were educated on the NBS process and FH. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, and a thematic analysis was performed in multiple steps.

resultsAll interviewees indicated that they would be interested in having their child be screened for FH on the newborn screen. Reasons supporting screening during the newborn period included knowing their child's diagnosis, the ability to screen family members for FH, incorporation of lifestyle changes, and access to preventive care. Negatives surrounding screening during the newborn period included increased stress or anxiety, knowledge, stigma, and the delay from diagnosis to initiation of pharmacotherapy for FH.

conclusionWhile these interviewees were in favor of NBS for FH, further education of parents and clinicians is needed to ensure proper implementation. The results of this study may be useful to formulate family notification and care protocols for newborns diagnosed with FH and other diseases.

Indexed as

Hyperlipoproteinemia Type IINeonatal ScreeningAttitudeChildGenetic TestingHumansInfant, NewbornMass ScreeningParentsChildrenCholesterolCoronary Artery DiseaseDyslipidemiaPopulation HealthUniversal Screening

Identifiers

PMID36964843
OpenAlexW4360941911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.