Trial reportWorld journal of urology2023
Effect of ureteric access sheath on outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stone disease: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Utilization of Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- Retrograde intrarenal surgery with or without ureteral access sheath: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyPooled it
- Impact of Ureteral Access Sheath Use on Renal Stone Clearance During Flexible Ureterorenoscopy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Handle with care: ureteral access sheath positioning modulates intrarenal pressure-insights from an EAU endourology ex vivo study using four ureteroscope sizes.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Clinical risk factors and machine learning-assisted interpretation of ureteral access sheath insertion failure: a multicenter study and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Does the use of a ureteral access sheath improve perioperative outcomes in ureteroscopy? A real-world multi-institutional study.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Status study of clinical application of ureteral access sheath in urology: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
- Outcomes of ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy with and without ureteral access sheaths for the treatment of renal calculi: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Central European journal of urology · 2025Review
- Effect of preoperative Silodosin on facilitating access sheath placement in retrograde intrarenal surgery. A randomized controlled studys.Arab journal of urology · 2025Article
- Ureteral access sheath. Does it improve the results of flexible ureteroscopy? A narrative review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe need of ureteric access sheath (UAS) in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has been controversial for gaining high success in terms of stone free rate (SFR), reducing operative times and complications. There has been lack of high level of evidence in the literature on this topic. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in the Department of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh from July 2019 to Dec 2021. The effect of UAS on the outcome of RIRS (SFR, operative time and complications) for renal stone disease was assessed. Ninety patients were randomized into two groups: 41 patients in Group 1 (RIRS with UAS) and 40 patients in Group 2(RIRS without UAS) were finally analyzed after exclusion. All the patients underwent preoperative double J stent placement at least 10 days prior to the definitive procedure. Operative time was recorded and postoperative pain was assessed by visual analogue scale(VAS) at 6 and 24 h postoperatively. Complications and emergency visits were recorded up to one month post procedure. SFR was assessed at 1 month using noncontrast CT KUB. Success was defined as absence of any residual fragment more than 3 mm in maximum diameter.
resultsDemographic parameters (age, body mass index, and comorbidities) and preoperative parameters (stone burden, proportion of recurrent stone formers and proportion of patients with inferior calyceal stones) were comparable between the two groups. Operative times (45.49 vs 48.38 min; p - 0.484) and VAS scores at 6 and 24 h post-op (p - 0.577) were also comparable between Group 1 and Group 2. SFR was comparable in Group 1 and Group 2 (78.05% vs 80%, p - 0.829). Postoperative complications were higher in the UAS group, but not statistically significant (4.88% vs 0%; p - 0.157).
conclusionThe use of UAS during RIRS is not associated with improved SFR. RIRS can be performed safely without the use of UAS and without increasing postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36964820What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.