ArticleClinical oral investigations2023
Evaluation of bone area in the posterior region for mandibular molar distalization in class I and class III patients.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expert consensus on the clinical strategies for orthodontic treatment with clear aligners.International journal of oral science · 2025Review
- More molar distal movement than pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography posterior space available at the root level in mandibular dentition distalization with microimplants.The Angle orthodontist · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the bone area in the posterior region, which is important for mandibular molar distalization in skeletal class I and class III individuals with normodivergent and hyperdivergent vertical growth patterns. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 120 individuals divided into 4 groups as class I normodivergent (group-I), class I hyperdivergent (group-II), class III normodivergent (group-III), and class III hyperdivergent (group-IV). Retromolar area at crown level measurements was performed on CBCT-derived panoramic radiographs and axial sections. Retromolar area at the root level was measured 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, and 10 mm apical to cemento-enamel junction at CBCT axial sections.
resultsRetromolar area decreased towards the root apex in all groups and smallest retromolar area was level of CEJ
conclusionsIn normodivergent individuals, the retromolar area length at the root level is observed to be higher in class III than in class I at almost every level. In hyperdivergent individuals, on the other hand, only at CEJ CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CBCT provides more useful information than panoramic radiographs for patients who are scheduled for large mandibular molar distalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.