ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2023
A computed tomography (CT) based morphometric study of superior pubic ramus anatomy among Arabs to determine safe intramedullary pubic rami screw insertion.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy of 3D radiological skull measurements: reoriented sections and geometric correction versus caliper reference.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Retrograde locked nailing of pubic ramus fractures: a technical note.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- Iliopubic rami morphology and its vascular relationships in percutaneous retrograde fixation.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the superior pubic ramus and supra acetabular corridors using statistical shape modelling.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2024Article
- Anatomy of the pudendal nerve in clinically important areas: a pictorial essay and narrative review.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the morphometric variables of the superior pubic ramus in an Arab/ Middle Eastern population to establish a safe pubic screw fixation technique.
methodsCross-sectional retrospective analysis of computed tomography (CT) pelvic images. Morphometric data were extracted including; on pubic ramus length, insertion angles, potential danger zones and ramus diameters. The correlation between pubic rami diameter and patient demographics was also analyzed.
resultsA total of 231 participants were included (45% female). The mean pubic ramus length was 104 mm in females and 127 mm in males. The narrowest canal diameters at the para-symphyseal area were; 7.35 mm (males) and 4.75 mm (females). The mediolateral insertion angle was 49.4° in females and 41.8° in males. The cephalic-caudal angle was 49.9° in males and 42.1° in females. The mean distance from the lateral ilium entry point to the joint articular surface was 23.5 mm in males and 19.9 mm in females. The symphysis pubis to tubercle exit point was higher in females than males (24.2 mm vs 16.6 mm, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation between age and pubic ramus diameters in all age groups.
conclusionThe results from this study suggest that percutaneous pubic rami screw fixation using the standard 6.5 or 7.3 mm cannulated screw system may potentially be unsafe in female Arab patients. This subset of patients may require alternative non-cannulated screws (3.5-4.5 mm) or plate options. Further, female patients may have a higher risk of acetabular joint penetration, while males have a potentially higher risk of pudendal nerve injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36964777What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.