Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964775›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2023

Fully automated magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics analysis for differentiating pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Qi Li, Zhenghao Zhou, Yukun Chen, Jieyu Yu, Hao Zhang, Yinghao Meng, Mengmeng Zhu, Na Li, Jian Zhou, Fang Liu and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. EUSEndoscopic ultrasound
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Qi Li *Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Zhenghao Zhou *Institute for AI in Medicine, School of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, No. 219 Ning Liu Road, Nanjing, 210044, Jiangsu, China.
Yukun Chen *Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Jieyu YuDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Hao ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Yinghao MengDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Mengmeng ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Na LiDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Jian ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Fang LiuDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Xu FangDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Tiegong WangDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Jianping LuDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China.
Teng ZhangInstitute for AI in Medicine, School of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, No. 219 Ning Liu Road, Nanjing, 210044, Jiangsu, China.
Jun XuInstitute for AI in Medicine, School of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, No. 219 Ning Liu Road, Nanjing, 210044, Jiangsu, China. xujung@gmail.com.
Chengwei ShaoDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China. chengweishaoch@163.com.
Yun BianDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Shanghai, 200434, China. bianyun2012@foxmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and validate an automated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based model to preoperatively differentiate pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

methodsThis retrospective study included patients with surgically resected, histopathologically confirmed PASC or PDAC who underwent MRI between January 2011 and December 2020. According to time of treatment, they were divided into training and validation sets. Automated deep-learning-based artificial intelligence was used for pancreatic tumor segmentation. Linear discriminant analysis was performed with conventional MRI and radiomic features to develop clinical, radiomics, and mixed models in the training set. The models' performances were determined from their discrimination and clinical utility. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used for survival analysis.

resultsOverall, 389 and 123 patients with PDAC (age, 61.37 ± 9.47 years; 251 men) and PASC (age, 61.99 ± 9.82 years; 78 men) were included, respectively; they were split into the training (n = 358) and validation (n = 154) sets. The mixed model showed good performance in the training and validation sets (area under the curve: 0.94 and 0.96, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 76.74%, 93.38%, and 89.39% for the training set, respectively, and 67.57%, 97.44%, and 90.26% for the validation set, respectively. The mixed model outperformed the clinical (p = 0.001) and radiomics (p = 0.04) models in the validation set. Log-rank test revealed significantly longer survival in the predicted PDAC group than in the predicted PASC group (p = 0.003), according to the mixed model.

conclusionOur mixed model, which combined MRI and radiomic features, can be used to differentiate PASC from PDAC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, AdenosquamousCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedArtificial IntelligenceHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCarcinomaMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingPancreatic ductal carcinomaPancreatic neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.