Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964753›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2023

The Impact of Wages on Care Home Quality in England.

Stephen Allan, Florin Vadean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephen AllanPersonal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1208-9837
Florin VadeanPersonal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7882-3400

Funding

Department of Health 15/144/51
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesIn many countries, a large proportion of long-term care staff are paid at, or near, minimum wage, leading to concerns of negative effects on care outcomes. This study analyzed the effect of staff wages on care home quality ratings in England. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA national staffing database of long-term care providers was matched with local-area information on needs and supply to construct a 3-year panel (2016-2018) of English care home observations. Using multiple imputation methods to address missing data provided a data set of 12,055 observations of 5,556 care facilities (both residential and nursing homes). We analyzed the effect of the facility-level average hourly wage of care staff on national regulator quality ratings. A measure of the impact of exogenous changes in the national minimum wage on care facilities was used as an instrument for wage.

resultsWe find that wages positively affect care home quality ratings. Other things equal, a 10% increase in the average hourly wage of direct care workers would lead to a 7.1% increase in the likelihood that a care home will have a high-quality rating. The wage effect on quality was significant when controlling for staff skill mix, measured as the share of registered nurses in nursing home staff. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: This study provides important evidence of the positive impact that staff pay can have on the quality of long-term care. Our finding has important implications for appropriate levels of pay and the funding of long-term care.

Indexed as

Long-Term CareNursing HomesEnglandHumansQuality of Health CareSalaries and Fringe BenefitsCare homesLong-term careNursing homesService ratingsStaff

Identifiers

PMID36964753
PMCPMC10581380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.