ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023
Precise acetabular positioning, discrepancy in leg length, and hip offset using a new seven-axis robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty system requires no learning curve: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: Cumulative Sum Analysis.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2026Article
- [Progress and future prospects of robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Review
- Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) was associated with a shorter learning curve, greater implant accuracy, and reduced team stress than conventional THA when performed by a junior surgeon: a comparative study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- AI-driven 3D virtual surgical planning in total hip arthroplasty: a machine learning approach for precision implant positioning and improved clinical outcomes.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- An algorithm for personalized optimal acetabular cup implant positioning based on bony coverage rate and impingement-free range of motion.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty in the United States: a nationwide propensity-matched analysis of adoption, outcomes, and complications.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- MAKO Robotic-Arm-Assisted Versus Conventional Dual-Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Score-Matched Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty: optimal and rapid preservation of femoral offset and operated lower limb length.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Anatomical landmarks and intraoperative "safe zone" for precise acetabular prosthesis placement in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Learning Curves Associated With Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic-assisted Versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.Oman medical journal · 2025Review
- Efficacy of a novel, fluoroscopy-based robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty system in restoring limb length and offset.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Relating total hip replacement and acetabular cup positioning with outcome: A systematic review.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Incidental findings in preoperative computed tomography images of robotic-assisted total joint replacement: a multi-center retrospective study.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Multicenter survey about leg length discrepancy and total hip arthroplasty: preoperative and intraoperative management.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2024Article
- The LANCET robotic system can improve surgical efficiency in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective randomized, multicenter, parallel-controlled clinical trial.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2024Article
- A review of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.Biomedical engineering letters · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of the present study was to determine the learning curve for a novel seven-axis robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RA-THA) system, and to explore whether it was able to provide greater accuracy in acetabular cup positioning, superior leg length discrepancy (LLD), and hip offset than conventional methods.
methodsA total of 160 patients in which unilateral THA was performed in the second affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from July 2021 to September 2022 were studied. The first 80 patients underwent robot-assisted THA, while conventional THA was performed on the subsequent 80 by the same team of experienced surgeons. The learning curve for the RA-THA system was evaluated using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. The demographic data, preoperative clinical data, duration of surgery, postoperative Harris hip score (HHS) and postoperative radiographic data from patients that had conventional THA were compared.
resultsThe 80 patients who underwent primary unilateral RA-THA comprised 42 males and 38 females and were followed up for 12 weeks. Using analysis by CUSUM, the learning curve of the RA-THA system could be divided into learning and proficiency phases, the former of which consisted of the first 17 cases. There was no significant difference between the learning and proficiency phases in terms of LLD, hip offset, or accuracy of acetabular prosthesis position in the RA-THA groups. The proportion of acetabular prostheses located in the Lewinnek safe zone was 90.5% in the proficiency group and 77.5% in the conventional group, respectively, a difference that was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The absolute error between target angle and postoperative measured angle of anteversion was statistically significant in the proficiency group and the conventional group((P < 0.05). Postoperative acetabular anteversion and LLD were 19.96 ± 5.68° and 6.00 (5.00) mm in the proficiency group, respectively, and 17.84 ± 6.81° and 8.09 (4.33) mm using conventional surgery, respectively (anteversion: P = 0.049; LLD: P < 0.001).
conclusionsThe surgical team required a learning curve of 17 cases using the RA-THA system to become proficient. There was no learning curve for other parameters, namely LLD, hip offset, or accuracy of acetabular prosthesis positioning. During the proficiency phase, the RA system was superior to conventional THA for control of leg length and accuracy of acetabular cup placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.