Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36964523›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2023

The effectiveness of peer support from a person with lived experience of mental health challenges for young people with anxiety and depression: a systematic review.

Magenta B Simmons, Sharla Cartner, Roxxanne MacDonald, Sarah Whitson, Alan Bailey, Ellie Brown

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06398561 (Peer-led Intervention for Individuals With Major Depression.), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
22.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06398561 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Peer-led Intervention for Individuals With Major Depression.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of the Balearic IslandsRan2024 to 2026Enrolled81ConditionsDepressive Disorder, MajorArmsActive Patient Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Young Australian Women's Views on Peer Support for Self-Harm: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Magenta B SimmonsOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia. magenta.simmons@orygen.org.au.
Sharla CartnerOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Roxxanne MacDonaldOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sarah WhitsonOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Alan BaileyOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Ellie BrownOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Orygen · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeer workers support individuals experiencing mental health challenges by drawing on their shared lived experience. Peer support has become increasingly popular for young people with anxiety and depression, but the evidence base is unclear. This systematic review aimed to understand the effectiveness of peer support for youth depression and anxiety (either primary or comorbid), and to understand in which contexts, for whom, and why peer support works.

methodsA systematic search was conducted with the Orygen Evidence Finder, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycInfo from January 1980 to July 2022. Controlled trials of interventions to improve mental health in young people (mean age 14-24), delivered by a peer worker with lived experienced of mental health challenges were included. Outcomes related to depression or anxiety were extracted and descriptive synthesis was undertaken due to the heterogeneity of studies. Study quality was rated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme; reporting adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

resultsNine randomised controlled trials with 2,003 participants were included, with seven undertaken in high income countries. One targeted depression and anxiety, two stigma-distress (any mental disorder), one first episode psychosis, four studies preventing eating disorders and one drug misuse. One study successfully reduced anxiety and depression, another reduced depression only, four reported reductions in negative affect, with the final three measuring, but not having a significant impact on depression. Study quality was rated as 'good' overall. DISCUSSION: Despite the uptake of youth peer support globally, there is limited evidence from controlled trials of the effect of peer support-related interventions on anxiety and depression. There is some effect on negative affect, especially for university students. Further rigorously designed trials of peer delivered interventions for young people need to be conducted with a focus on understanding the mechanisms of action underpinning peer support.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPsychotic DisordersAdolescentAdultAnxietyAnxiety DisordersDepressionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung AdultAnxietyDepressionEarly interventionMental healthPeer supportPeer workerYouth

Identifiers

PMID36964523
PMCPMC10038377
OpenAlexW4360826446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read34
reference markers read24
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.